

the epstein files.


the epstein files.


assuming this is about sex and since you said you can’t have him, just accept that some blood sausages are not for you. go find another.
you know, installing some al-qaeda dissident on power but he’s totally fine now since he uses a suit.
So your only reason to support one or another party is getting laid?
costa rica legalized same-sex marriage in 2020, have free public education, a medicare-style public health, is full of wildlife protection, has freedom of expression and no military, and is relatively peaceful (more peaceful than most latin american countries, for sure). don’t know about employment and cost of living, though.
another option is uruguay which benefits from most of these characteristics. wildlife is not lush though, as most of the country is empty, flat steppes mostly used for grazing cattle and sheep.
Have you looked for book clubs, gyms, courses in your region?
In this case I could verify by seeing, asking around and peeking their Instagram. Small town thing.
This came to my mind right now: people within the age range I’m willing to consider (25-45) are more likely to be already married or dating someone.


Wrong. Theoden at least was a more or less good ruler. Trump is part of the problem. He’s as if the mouth of Sauron ruled over Rohan.


Eating better. Reducing carbs and eating more fruit and vegetables. I’ve had to give up some eating habits that I had before but I’m loving the results on my body.
My two cents on dating apps in general:


Asking for a divorce.
Scottish and Irish.
just sayin’, russians had no qualms or juridical implications when they removed nicholas ii.


realistically, lojban, aui, mirad or kotava.
out of fictional languages, quenya, klingon, or the language of the culture from iain m. banks’ books.


One of the South American variants of Spanish, probably Argentinian.
I’d agree on the sense that everything in argentine spanish can be said with thousands of curse words interspersed. ¡la puta madre que lo parió, boludo de mierda!


i’m not against killing per se. you can kill in self defense for example and be excused. people can kill in a war or a revolution and be excused. in a perfect world, of course, people wouldn’t have reasons to kill. i think the line is drawn if 1) someone massively kills or acts sadistically for chauvinistic reasons (i. e. for being part of a group of persons, not being of the right ethnicity or because they believe in some sort of pseudoscience, like anti-vaxers) 2) are or were in a position of power or high leadership 3) are at risk of returning to positions of power even after arrest (for example, they can be rescued from prison in a coup d’état by its supporters, or being pardoned by political shifts).
the regular serial killer such as manson or ed gein were not in real positions of power and were not at risk of returning to such positions, and could therefore be jailed forever. himmler, heydrich, eichmann, king leopold ii, mobutu, suharto, pretty much every latin american, african, european or asian dictator deserved to be judged with penalties up to the death penalty, and even some “democratic” leaders such us some british prime ministers and french presidents. not to say that i’m only restricting to right, i believe stalin, ceaucescu, enver hoxha and to some extent even mao should be defendants in processes that could lead up to death penalty.


The fact that Xwitter became such an echo chamber and that people there really started to believe that they were the moral compasses of humanity made it gain the appropriate nickname, here in Brazil, of “Black (in the sense of rotten) Banana Institute”.
At least in Brazil we use our names, sometimes with the pronunciation in the language we’re studying. No need to use a foreign name.