lad

If that’s a joke, it’s a good one. Otherwise, well, there are a lot of “this letter isn’t needed let’s throw it away,” in most cases it will not work as good as you think.

They started replacing the default screenshot tool with snipping tool, but maybe it’s not the default to call it with PrtScr

Saving from source was in context of saving from Instagram, I find screenshooting Web pages less fitting than getting into the source of the page, albeit the former is simpler

Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better

I was reading the comments expecting this movie to pop up. I only watched half, because it wasn’t interesting enough, but also want to re-watch because maybe I was just not ready or something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don’t think this operator is a real feature, tbh 😅

This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.

Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology’s view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up

Not quite related to the topic, but I encountered several ‘books’ that can be replaced by several paragraphs of text, and this is almost as bad as making three hours video instruction where 30 seconds or a bit of text would suffice. I find it horrible that such ones are written at all

How lossy can it be until it’s not infringement? One-line summary of some book is also a lossy reproduction

Well, I’m in awe of their commitment to transparency now. Not sure if it is the sole reason, but still impressive

You’re maybe not wrong, but I expect that even then the amount of lead and lead salts that gets in the water will be significantly higher than from non-lead pipes

Yeah, in case of polio and pox, there’s no question of if it will be beneficial

I couldn’t agree more with the latter part, I know a lot of backend engineers who consider frontend simple without ever trying what it really takes. This is not a healthy way to view someone else’s work, and it usually produces friction between back and front end teams

I was toldo the other day that in ten years there will be no testers because developers will do all the testing.

I’ve seen how it works out in practice: there’s not enough time for testing and for developing, too, developers are going to burn and the product is going to be shit done and shit tested. Maybe it works if your company is willing to spend extra for less results by someone doing all the stuff less efficient than what they could, but that’s a rare occurrence.

I think, this was what future was imagined at the beginning of the previous century. It definitely is what I would rather like to see instead of what we got, where automation is not for easing the work, but for removing the people.

It doesn’t work on all the cats, though. Also, I heard that it’s not painful for a cat to be lifted that way, but I would prefer not to.

Edit: I was wrong