Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg
Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination
The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.
Reasonable and viable ≠ RFC compliant
This quote summarises my views:
There is some danger that common usage and widespread sloppy coding will establish a de facto standard for e-mail addresses that is more restrictive than the recorded formal standard.
This is the ideal rendition, I would say. On a related note, I just love it when there are backspaces in my filenames
There are many regexes that validate email, and they usually aren’t compliant with the RFC, there are some details in the very old answer on SO. So, better not validate and just send a confirmation, than restrict and lock people out, imo
and which of these two you are going to get paid more for
neither :(
It looks like exactly 4 characters are missing, so public
and static
would fit, but I never saw static
instead of public static
, so I think you’re right. On the other hand, I don’t use Java anymore and couldn’t be bothered about such details
Depends on what was the course about. If it’s about computation, then sure. If it’s about OOP or architecture design (this one I wouldn’t expect, unfortunately, but would be nice if it was taught somewhere), then the point is not just to run something.
I mostly come to prefer composition, this approach apparently even has a wiki page. But that’s in part because I use Rust that forbids inheritance, and don’t have such bullshit (from delegation wiki page):
class A {
void foo() {
// "this" also known under the names "current", "me" and "self" in other languages
this.bar();
}
void bar() {
print("a.bar");
}
}
class B {
private delegate A a; // delegation link
public B(A a) {
this.a = a;
}
void foo() {
a.foo(); // call foo() on the a-instance
}
void bar() {
print("b.bar");
}
}
a = new A();
b = new B(a); // establish delegation between two objects
Calling b.foo() will result in b.bar being printed, since this refers to the original receiver object, b, within the context of a. The resulting ambiguity of this is referred to as object schizophrenia
Translating the implicit this into an explicit parameter, the call (in B, with a a delegate) a.foo() translates to A.foo(b), using the type of a for method resolution, but the delegating object b for the this argument.
Why would one substitute b
as this
when called from b.a
is beyond me, seriously.
Even if it is not their fault, what people see is that they provide bad quality service. Very low percentage ofthem will care to read details when Netflix publishes a post-mortem of an issue, assuming they even do.
I feel like ‘a half is one-third more than a third’ is ambiguous and same as in ‘X is N% more than Y’ one may use X or Y as 100%
I’m sure that one interpretation is more common, but I don’t think that it is exclusively correct
Or in Puerto Rico, for that matter 🌚
Is there some sort of TL;DR if I don’t want to listen to him even for just 10 minutes?
Early returns improve readability in that they make it simpler to read, but I also find them decreasing readability in that you may miss an early return and wonder why is execution not hitting the line you expect it to
I tried to learn assembly for that, but never did after all
I should have added a ‘/s’, but I thought it is somewhat obvious, it really reminds of all the ‘git gud at C instead of doing Rust’
It’s a dig at people who don’t want to switch to memory-safe languages like rust.
Now that’s a stretch, it could be anything (no, it couldn’t, although I think this may have application to some other pairs of languages)
To be fair, I’m using Linux, MacOS with Darwin Nix for managing it, Windows, and I still am not sure what exactly is an operating system, what’s the role of kernel and all of the possible system software is. Well, I think kernel is for hardware abstraction, but other than that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Only third party sync, I use Syncthing for that, works great most of the time
Almost nowhere but America exists /s