![](https://fedia.io/media/d4/65/d46507ce34dccf9631d7bda6a429cba8f6f6551e8b40260a242c5db27733b7a0.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
we absolutely should not do this until we understand it
Other accounts:
we absolutely should not do this until we understand it
You’re either trolling or too stubborn to evaluate new information that might change your position.
Medicare For All is not free healthcare, as in on the government’s dime, it is entirely paid for by taxes. (Unless you actually object to free healthcare as in being able to go to the hospital when you need it for free, which is too ludicrous to be sincere.) The only reason it seems “free” is that the total operating cost of the system without the middleman of private insurance is significantly lower than our existing healthcare spending.
Most households would significantly increase their spending power throughout the year by eliminating healthcare premiums, deductibles, copays, and prescription costs in excess of $200 a year, and would only see a smaller increase at tax time. Those who would be paying more in total are very wealthy households who would be paying primarily at tax time, and frankly many of those households have not been paying their fair share of taxes already, so I find it hard to see that as a bad thing.
deleted by creator
I take back the benefit of the doubt I gave in my earlier reply. This reply is as unhinged as the Navy SEAL copypasta. You need mental health support.
I think your problem is here:
You should test this out for yourself as I’m not going to take days or a week making a great presentation of a technical case.
You’ve written a whole lot to try to be convincing but ultimately stopped short of actually proving what you’ve alleged. It looks to me you are frustrated that no one is taking you at your word and going down this rabbit hole themselves, when the various reputational elements you’re relying on are going to be important only to a minority of users. Burden of proof works how it always has, however.
If you’re providing it to only some people, it’s not very universal now is it
I’ve only seen kids feeling like shit because of social media, myself
well for the handful of old-ass games I like that refuse to play nice on linux I’ll keep that in mind
A full suit of SDcale mail armour, however…
there are 1 TB microsdxc now, so that’d be 1.2 trillion to one
the trump clap sounds like an uber-STI and thanks I hate it
Cyber truck: it just kills you ™
It looks like their May 16th tweet stated source code would be made available to developers, and they are clearing up some ambiguity in this new one.
According to the DOJ, Google destroyed potentially hundreds of thousands of chat sessions not just during their investigation but also during litigation. Google only stopped the practice after the DOJ discovered the policy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampering_with_evidence#Spoliation
I’m glad it seems to be limited to their weird DocuSign knockoff, which I never had cause to use.
Lucky for you! Twice over the years I have had Windows 10, the system failed to come back up after a windows update and the ability to uninstall the most recent update through the recovery partition saved me.
You may or may not have a mechanism to limit bandwidth on the whole connection. It could be at the router level or possibly an option on your network card configuration. If you have the capability, setting a limit at 90% of your bandwidth should leave enough room to minimize the issues you’re seeing.
You should dual boot it with Windows. Then you get the beeeeeeest of both worlds…
very obviously yes. Twice as many bullet points as a human would put in a summary, passive voice, and “the author xxx” are all telltale signs