Wait, hydrogen? After SWB, you mean.
Almost as smuuth as sharks.
Wait, hydrogen? After SWB, you mean.
Yup! Let’s account for all of it! Seriously! Let’s find the optimal lowest carbon solution!
Great. Is hydrogen powered construction and mining equipment common? No. So until it is, my statement stands. Concluding that all equipment is clean because it CAN be is daft.
Clean until you use a bunch of equipment to get it captured. The hydrogen might be carbon free, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a carbon footprint.
Convince me otherwise, but the only green hydrogen is from renewable energy powered electrolysis.
I would LOVE to know what, if any IP, patents, or tech came out of this whole thing. I’m guessing “not much”.
I want my Google Plus back.
Based on your examples I’d suggest The Mitchells vs The Machines.
I am not, it’s not relevant. The inmate is going to be murdered by the state, that is a fact. The only choice here is method. How is using a method that has been chosen for suicide cruel?
Again, not condoning the death penalty, just don’t see how the change of context for the method changes its nature.
You’re forgetting that this person is going to die by the State’s hand regardless of the method. Given that, how is nitrogen asphyxiation more cruel than lethal injection?
I’m not condoning the death penalty, just confused why someone would say nitrogen asphyxiation is cruel and unusual when in another context it’s desirable.
So, the Swiss suicide pod lets you kill yourself with nitrogen gas, and apparently that’s absolutely fine and painless.
Alabama thinks about using nitrogen gas, and it’s cruel and unusual?
WTF am I missing here? Or is it all just the BS hyperbole of US politics?
But they’re not using drunk people, they’re using hung over people. Not sure why, it’s an interesting question.
Formerly inebriated people.
A free burger would make for a very expensive data set methinks.
So, who is providing the software? Because that’s who is paying to get a unique data set of face images. Specifically Brazilian faces of people who either self-indentify as hung over or want to try to game the system for a discount. I’ll let you guess which population is going to be bigger.
“Thousands” of Americans betting on something happening isn’t an indication of likelihood nearly as much as it’s an example of wishful thinking and/or the Dunning-Kruger effect.
How do you drive demand? If there’s no infrastructure you can’t sell anything that relies on said infrastructure. How’s California’s Hydrogen Highway doing? Not good. Demand and infrastructure go hand in hand, and you can’t magically make one develop without the other. Thinking otherwise is merely wishful thinking.
What Toyota is doing isn’t a good indicator. They’ve been at hydrogen for decades. And they are the single biggest laggard for decarbonizing transportation. That’s not even an opinion, that’s just facts about their lobbying and marketing. No amount of research will make hydrogen infrastructure appear.
Hah, no. Storage and infrastructure are still non-existent. And low temperature operation is still an issue.
I’ve always hoped so. Finally deal with both range anxiety and charging time together.
That’s his videos now. Get you to watch them to hype Crunch Labs.