![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4271bdc6-5114-4749-a5a9-afbc82a99c78.png)
No, not at all. Sure the rich want to be richer, but hurting the poor is a goal in and of itself in our world.
No, not at all. Sure the rich want to be richer, but hurting the poor is a goal in and of itself in our world.
Obviously not. hurting bad people is morally neutral at worst.
They didn’t even bring up the actual alarming issue of sheriff’s who think they are the supreme authority of the land either. Very weird article, it’s like someone missed an entire decade.
You realize you could watch every ad on every video a creator puts out for a year and generate them less than a coffee, yeah? If you care go give them 5 dollars.
Fuck, an integrated donation/payment thing on YouTube would go so much farther for Google’s profit than ads ever would as well!
Not scam ads, intrusive ads. A decade ago i read cracked and the only ads were non intrusive sidebar ads or a banner at the top. They didn’t play music, they didn’t interrupt what i was doing, they just existed. Google, being the near complete monopoly it is, could easily force the standard to return to that and many people would never even go looking for adblockers.
I’ll let the ublock team carve demonic sigils into me and sacrifice my grandma if that’s what it escalates to, I’d sooner lose YouTube entirely than sit through those ads
Can’t you block ads on twitch?
You aren’t an investor if you are planning to resell. Day trading and real investment are totally at odds. It’s far better (for retirement) to invest in a stable company and get a set return over time for it. We also don’t even need to do that for retirement, the fact that we do is fucking insane.
They could use their monopolies to force advertisers to pay a fair amount for a decent ad instead of taking pennies to ruin the Internet. I never even considered using an ad blocker back when it was just banner ads. Or maybe they could stop being a full decade behind the times and add donations to YouTubers for a cut. If they add value to premium instead of trying to remove value from the base experience they could even triple dip on these ideas.
I’m not stubborn, I’m just not going to accept a worse version of what I’ve already got.
Objectively isn’t
People believe those things because the economy is bad and we use worthless measurements (like, say, GDP) to plaster over that fact. If children are only ever taught one way to look at something they’ll force it to conform with the obvious reality once it’s undeniable.
What wrong with brave? Never used it and don’t know much about it myself
Because they were explicitly created to disenfranchise black people.
It’s still democracy if it has entry requirements, and it’d probably function better.
Let’s be real, it was mid even back then.
I’m proud to be a ‘loser’ by our standards. I think it was theory of a deadman’s lowlife that really made me think about how much better it is to simply not fucking care about all the bullshit.
“evil” is a really particular word. It’s hard to call most people “evil” even if they are an objective drain in the world at large, but these people are evil.
It won’t even do that, heatstroke causes a pretty big operating loss.
Execute them for treason too. The ruling explicitly allows the president to do anything he wants as long as it is official business and a good president would use this moment to fix the country.