Yes, most of the Lemmy apps work with PieFed too. To varying degrees.

No filtering, just all posts in the last week. It’s probably higher in some communities than others, yep!

That won’t have any effect unless the author of the Note is the same as the author of the original post. You’re welcome to try it.

The json structure used during federation does not limit the kind of access control checks we can do.

Subscribed should be the default, like in PieFed.

Yes to the first but no to the second. Anyway the point is the ephemeral feeling is probably not so much because of the deletion (as it’s quite rare) and more to do with a lack of date filters on the search.

I’m PieFed you can set the search to order by recent instead of relevance which sometimes helps but being able to specify a date range while still sorting by relevance would be nice. I’ll add it to codeberg.

I just did some analysis.

3.3% of posts in the last week have been deleted (1.7% of comments).

agreed

PieFed rewrites the links to their local equivalent.

Works for me (Android versions of those apps).

Congrats :)

Yeah in Mastodon local means ‘posted by people on this instance’ but that’s a different definition of ‘local’ than what PieFed and Lemmy uses. Here local means ‘posted in a community hosted on this instance’.

That’s an interesting idea though and I’m open to making a second Local or an admin setting that changes what local does, if there is widely felt interest in it.

You are subscribed to some communities which only have a very very low number of subscribers, so their posts get boosted to the moon, despite being old.

If it doesn’t settle down in a day or two, consider unsubscribing from /c/fujifilm and /c/surfing

Looks like the scaled algo needs to be tamed a bit, to avoid those outliers.

I used my l33t hax0r skills to log in as you and there were downvote buttons everywhere there should be. I downvoted a post, too.

Sorry, I’m out of ideas. Must be something with your browser.

I cannot find any reason for this, your account is in good standing and none of the automated downvote blocks should be applying to you.

Maybe it’s a coded way of saying “the cognitive traits of sociopaths are what will make you do exceptionally well at Palentir, apply now”.

As if that wasn’t already obvious.

Or just an elaborate cover for a guy who overdid the pre-interview coke dosage.

I took the question to be “could you currently host fedi servers on the dark web, without any big changes to their code” but yeah I’m sure it’s possible to make it happen, if people wanted to put in the work.

Not feasible.

Just use an instance that is outside USA and not using a USA hosting company? Half the fediverse uses Hetzner, for example. OVH (French) is another popular provider.

Not really anything serious.

By poking around https://bonfire.fediverse.observer/list I found two (and only two) with open sign ups that do not say “demo and testing instance”:

Try:

https://discussions.sciety.org/

https://bonfire.home.coop/

It’s kinda amazing to me how they convinced so many people to give them money when that is all they have. I guess people want to have hope.

The story was invented so people would subscribe to his substack, which exists to promote his company.

We’re being manipulated into sharing made-up rage-bait in order to put money in his pocket.

The answer to that is literally in the first sentence of the body of the article I linked to.

GPTZero is 99% accurate.

https://gptzero.me/news/gptzero-accuracy-stats/