• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2023

help-circle





  • Maybe I just expect better from people on the left. But youā€™re rightā€¦ Why should they be different?

    But still. If one cares about one topic so much that they would not vote for someone because of it. Then why would they not go the extra mile and think about what the consequences of their decision will be with regard to that topic? And I donā€™t think that you have to be a political junkie to have such thoughts. Itā€™s no rocket science at all.

    Youā€™re totally right that material change is needed. I just doubt that thereā€™s so much Biden can do until next year. Even if such decisions were made right now, it would take a while until the effects would be felt. And if changes are not enshrined in law, theyā€™ll be gone soon. But thereā€™s no perspective to achieve that as long as you donā€™t control house, senate and presidency.



  • I wasnā€™t advocating for voting democrat solely because of Trump. I was advocating for carefully weighing the consequences of ones decision in elections.

    Politicians should learn what their base cares about and do something

    Iā€™m sorry but to me this is just borderline naive and it completely ignores all societal and political realities. The US has a 2 party system. Itā€™s shitty but right now thatā€™s exactly what it is.

    That means: All the things that some voter wants can only be represented by either one, or the other election platform or ideology. But even if you had a system that allowed for 5 or 6 parties to coexist in parliamentā€¦ What do you think: How many compromises would you have to make to allow yourself to vote for one of them? Iā€™ll guarantee you that you will always have to accept a lot of discrepancies between your ideals and the ideas a party wants to realize. Because that party must appeal to many voters if it wants to have a perspective to govern, i.e. implementing their ideas.

    And that is why there is no such thing as ā€œwhat their base wantsā€. The base of any political party will be diverse in their interests. To claim that the democratic base has ending the genocide in Gaza as their top priority is just wrong. It might be a sizable chunk of young voters but of course they can tip the scales in a close race.

    But thereā€™s another thing that I find naive here. And I see it in so many comments of the loud ā€œanti genocide joeā€ faction: And that is the part ā€œand do somethingā€ in your quote above. Why do some people think that the president of the US is so almighty that he could just snap his fingers and boom, the genocide is gone. He canā€™t make these decisions alone. Heā€™s part of a system of checks and balances for very good reasons. And the political reality is that there exist many, many competing interests in politics, there are binding contracts, there are diplomatic ties, etc. etc. To conclude: Itā€™s practically impossible for Biden to stop the genocide right now. So if anyone insists that one should not vote for him because he hasnā€™t used his divine powers for ending the genocide yetā€¦ For me itā€™s just dumb. It makes no fucking sense at all.