I don’t think that steals the headlines in a positive way.

Agreed it sucks. What do you want to do about it in the 2024 election?

And? These are the same people who roll coal to own the libs

Odd thing to request considering the conservatives in charge of Texas government deny that burning fossil fuels causes climate change.

The vast majority of people in the DFW area do not live on a dart line, and drive to commute

Yet

Me too \s

Because leaf blowers are fucking annoying and we need hope

You WILL set up Cortana or you WILL be put through the Setup Wizard

Efficiency is the real gay agenda

God he’s so punchable

Kissing girls is the gayest, if they’ve kissed another dude you’re technically kissing those dudes too \s

I think you mean job creators! \s

The trick here is the NYT trying to convince us that regular GOP economic policy ISN’T quackery. It’s all bullshit. Always has been. Trump isn’t more bullshit than any of the other GOP bullshitters.

Absolutely not and he’s learned nothing

“It took us some time to find our footing, but more than four months into this transition, I think we’re back on track and I expect to continue improving on our execution throughout the year getting us to an even better place than we’ve ever been.”

My hero

I mean it’s called fortune not broke ass \s

Paywalled hard

No, I can. I can point to the data in the article that shows that Manchin and west would benefit Trump when polled in 2023. I can point to data for progress showing that an “independent” candidate like Hogan would swing things for Trump. I can point to 2016 when fewer than 100k votes decided the election. I can use that to extrapolate out that the third party slate tends to benefit republicans. But my BROADER point is that you don’t actually give a shit, you could have googled this if you did, and you’ve been waiting for me to drop a name so you could determine precisely which bad faith, misguided, or incomplete argument against precisely that candidate you can pull out of your Rolodex of talking points.

So please get to your fucking point already because if it’s what you said in your comment then the answer was for you to READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE AND USE GOOGLE all along. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you were just a lazy troll who wanted me to say a name instead of reading a name in an article, but maybe it’s simpler than that: did you actually think I couldn’t name a third party candidate?

Can…can you not name one? Are you trying to get me to name one because you don’t know any? Is this a cry for help?

Yeah you got it bucko, I can’t name any candidates I just link to 538 articles that you don’t read. Seriously just make your point already, stop edging me.