This is different than the legislation being pushed in CA then, sorry it’s hard to keep up with the global enshittification of everything

An “I am an adult” checkbox in your OS that gets propagated out is probably the most privacy centric way to lock down kid accounts right?

Look they’re self reporting right here!

Hm those versions seem to match what I have going, is there special configuration for a TURN server or anything that you had to do?

What client version and server version? I’m running the latest docker container and whatever is in the arch repos

P2p streaming hasn’t worked for me on the Linux client

I feel obligated to mention that he doesn’t modify his own genes, he infects himself with a modified bacteria that produces lactase.

Monoxide

Short of explicit developer lockout

Removed by mod

Files are encrypted at rest, if they are not actively interfacing with the encrypted mount it is secure. If you encrypt your entire system it’s safe from attacks when powered off, but as soon as you’re booted in the machine is fully accessible.

Short of manually deleting .git you can always find any commit, you can walk backwards through your reference lof if it comes to it, the only real risk is throwing out unstaged changes.

Do you have a reference for that? I haven’t seen any channels that saw noticable decline in non desktop viewership

I once tried to delete the .steam folder off of an hold SSD, but the .steam folder is a symlink :(

Looks like a blizzard is in the realm of $6? I don’t go to DQ, but living in a region with many of them I can say gas is generally accessible for ~$2.50 so unless you’re driving something that gets 10mpg there’s basically no way to make buying two be worth it. I only have to fill up gas once every month or two because my car is a plug in hybrid and I rarely go more than ~40 miles in a trip so it’s unlikely I use gas at all. With free nights I don’t even really pay much to fill my battery.

Gas is pretty cheap

Wouldn’t you be incapable of enjoying the sun

What connection do you think a third party is saving when using openid? Generally speaking the only thing the third party needs is your identifier which in most cases is just an email. It’s no more devastating for the user base for that information to be leaked than it is when they’re handling authorization themselves. I personally think using a government backed authorization platform is a terrible idea and something completely liable to be abused by those in power, but it would objectively be better than trying to have every single service store your personally identifiable information themselves.

??? This is just textbook sso/openid but backed by the government. There’s nothing intrinsically insecure about having third parties send you directly to a trusted government site for authorization.

I think he maintained git at its inception for like 6 months and then passed it off to someone else, but I could be completely mistaken.