Don’t wanna state the obvious, but it looks like they still ended up staring at each other for the rest of the evening.

They have shown that they still love each other, so hope they can work with their one irreconcilable difference.

ALL KINDS OF SUFFERING ARE MERGE CONFLICTS

GIT IS OUR MIRROR

REBASE IS HEAVEN

Be grateful to your taste buds. Enjoy the life they have saved for you (and them).

That’s a noble goal but does adding more people help the (long-term only, please) effectiveness? At what point does it start hindering it?

I would assume that someone like a pharmacist has to be focused all the time, stakes is high…

Do we have precise data about how physiological state of a pharmacist is changing through the shift? Do we know whether or not the pauses between people – which we might or might not have considered a wasted time – are actually essential for their ability to stay focused and reliable? (Is the answer the same for all of them?) Or maybe they could actually still use part of that time in a productive way, right? Also, why is there lack of people in the first place?

Focusing solely on adding more people to the equation seems to neglect factors like this. This tells me that whoever this factoid is trying to impress is not someone who I would want to trust with managing a pharmacy (or anything except maybe some production line) in the first place.

oh, I toatlly typoed it

(LOL I made a perfect “What Iou See Ys What Iou Get”)

Is “pharmacists seeing more patients” really a measure of something good? I’m a non-native English speaker so cut me some slack but all I can imagine is just longer queues in the pharmacy and more tired pharmacists (and people who now need to wait in the queue now).

The pic being blurred and all, I thought it’s going to be some dad joke around “pharmacist can see more patients”

WISYWIG managing nested bullet point or numbered lists should be in right-bottom corner.

I like that plan because it ends up paying 200%

edit: 199%

how do glasses use dog?

“for each desired change, make the change easy (warning: this may be hard), then make the easy change”

Kent Beck (got this version of his quote from Twitter but it’s much older than that)

Great post, but I have to “well, actually” you on this little thing:

the REST protocol demands it.

REST is not a protocol, and does not have to do anything with JSON.

(eg. How Did REST Come To Mean The Opposite of REST? by Carson Gross)

The issue is bridging the gap

Yes, but the irony is that we already have the bridges, it’s just we keep jumping off of them at random places, thinking it’s the other bank.

No, we should educate all devs and fix all broken time API’s,…

wait, your solution seems far easier.

No, take tHe NeW jErSeY approach. Keep the implementation simple.

Everyone, everywhere on UTC.

• 7:00 - Everyone wake up at

• 8:00 - Everyone go to school/work 8:00 AM

• …

• 21:00 - Everyone sleep.

We’ll figure out the logistics as we go.

new order of monks

New Order of Monks, in short, NOOM

No wonder they never invented time machines to get to the future, if we’re so keen on bullying them.

Can’t help but think of a “senior dev” “explaining” (hing: brain-dumping) some bizarre reasoning why his unusable untested undocumented untyped API uses floats for item counts or something, and expecting the “junior dev” to just nod and keep that in their mind and adapt to it.

(Instead of making every possible excuse not to work with that API and instead doing something else where they can make some progress without going insane.)

If so many people weren’t leaving the field entirely due this issue (the chief complaint ALWAYS being under-staffing / low nurse-to-patient ratios, THEN pay), there would be plenty of nurses to go around

I think both can be true.

From expenses point of view, Isn’t under-staffing almost the same thing as low pay? What’s preventing hospital administrators from hiring more nurses? If it’s just money, then I don’t think the complaint of under-staffing all that different from the complaint of low pay; I suspect it’s even affected by sort of preference (some nurses would prefer working more for better pay, others would prefer sharing the workload.)

Of course from administration / governance point of view it boils down to money, what I’m saying is that I find it unlikely is that it’s “just hire more nurses”. It’s also doctors, other staff, etc. It’s more likely the whole system.

just hire more nurses

Look, I get your point, but it’s not like nurses grow on trees. (Especially good nurses.)

Things need fixing, but they need fixing far earlier than that.