But it’s also sort of taking both sides of an issue, and/or using idiocy as a trial balloon. So yeah idk

Then she will get a raise and be on fox news for a decade

Because they have a political science department?

Gerrymandering would make the president like the House. 55% of voters select Democrats but then 52% of selected representatives are Republicans 🤔

OK so normally when you are accused of a crime, you hire a lawyer who advises you not to talk about the charges. Why? Because then you say dumb shit like “well it was manslaughter because he robbed me” when your defense was focused on casting doubt it was you who pulled the trigger.

In this case, Trump may not be an authority, and that’s the point, it speaks to his INTENT. His intent was clearly to circumvent rules. Why is this even a discussion? This has all been thoroughly parsed.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/government-classification-and-mar-lago-documents

Uh yeah, even the stuff the president has authority for, he’d need an executive authority, which is more than just shouting I DECLARE IT’S DECLASSIFIED in a hallway of the Pentagon.

A) he said he doesn’t

B) he’s not the declassification authority on all classified information

Meet the bus

How about since McCain picked Sarah’ “pallin’ around with terrorists”, doesn’t rear the news’ Palin?

Oddly, no discussion about any of the debate writers and legislature had about this bill. As a lay person, I can kind of see both sides, would prefer the defendants win, but also feel like the INTENT of this recent law would be easy to find. If the intent was to free loads of people, or only just a few relatively innocent ones… I guess originalism only matters when people have been dead for hundreds of years.

I can paint as many nude images of Rihanna as I want.

I don’t think you are quite right.

They can override his veto.

It would be so much more efficient if the only people ever chosen at work were workaholics who hated their personal lives.

The vital Key Bridge

Unfortunately this is where the undecideds of our country are. Imagine not knowing who you’d vote for this year.

Remember when someone changing their mind was electoral cannon fodder?

It’s weird considering two unrelated hypotheticals. Especially in light of how Netanyahu can postpone his own election? I guess the flip side is his parliament could potentially oust him prematurely as well.

Still, what a stupid comparison.

You didn’t really read my post, did you

It’s almost like the law didn’t consider the idea that a bunch of angry and awful people would show up to one place intent on hurting each other. It’s almost like this is the opposite of civil order and he just showed up knowingly with a weapon.

I don’t really fault the jury for their conclusion, but gun owners just keep getting to show up with guns proving their own case that you need a gun everywhere to be safe.

This isn’t some silly partisan squabble. An echo chamber convinced a very very young man to show up and kill. And now he gets paid to speak? And you laugh at the people who rightfully hate him? Loool