Yep. This is why politically advocating for privacy by default is so important, albeit its not going well lmao.
MTF maths nerd
- 0 Posts
- 37 Comments
minty@aussie.zoneto
Europe@feddit.org•Finland tried to end homelessness. What can we learn from its runaway success – and recent failures?English
180·16 days ago“but in the last three years sweeping cuts to social services, healthcare and benefits by Finland’s rightwing government have seen the country’s success story go into reverse”
Classic
minty@aussie.zoneto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•You Should Stop Using Meta (Facebook) Products at All Costs
8·23 days agoOnly have messenger left. Considering doing another push to convince my stubborn friends to go on signal. Then I can finally be rid of meta
minty@aussie.zoneto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•How surrounded are you by opposing political views?
1·24 days agoIn my town, some lefty but also quite a few one nation farmer voters (one nation being australias trumpist party)
minty@aussie.zoneto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•How surrounded are you by opposing political views?
3·24 days agoGenerally surounded by socially liberal / left wing.
Exception is my dad who’s sort of fashy at times, which I do hate him for
My ex and I broke up for a few reasons.
First I think we couldnt handle conflict, in the sense of bringing it up even if it was needed.
Second, we lived far away. This one definitely effected it a lot, as its hard to not see them as a friend u meet up with occasionally.
Third, I came out as trans, so we both made the decision it was best to move on since my ex is straight.
Currently we are just friends, which is for the better.
noai duckduck go
I see what your saying, its just my friends have no interest in signal (tried a few times) so messenger is a compromise.
Oh yeah i just mean delete the app to make me stop looking at it. It was an addiction for me. Well, not facebook but instagram was.
There is an end to end encrypted feature, with a 6 digit pin to decrypt the keys I believe. a 6 digit pin isnt the most secure, but its better then nothing for typical conversations.
Annoyingly there is a feature that u can summarise texts with using AI, which ofc breaks privacy, but u can turn off message sharing (meaning you and the other person can no longer do that)
A few glaring alarm bells around privacy on messenger, but again, better then nothing.
The toxicity of instagram and the hollow content on facebook made me delete them. I still have messenger however, since convincing people to install signal is difficult, and also it is useful to communicate with new friends (considering the alternative is unencrypted sms)
But wow its so good to be off it
minty@aussie.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•'My heart is empty': Millions of Chinese forced to end AI relationshipsEnglish
29·2 months agoMy god we’re in a dystopian hell. I feel so fucking sad for these people :(
At least now the AI wont distract them from their loneliness so hopefully they contront it.
It depends on the evidence for the accusation just like anything else. I admit, for most accusations I don’t have time so just move on. For more serious accusations, I would think about it more whether its true.
Sometimes the US makes shit up, sometimes it doesn’t. Same with China. I just have to take the time to determine if the evidence is sound, at least in principle.
Thanks for the write up. I’ll have a look at the sources you sent
I don’t know those terms tbh because Im just some pleb. i would welcome some simple explanation of it.
Wikipedia asserts “300 to 2700” dead, with the CCP asserted toll (according to wikipedia) being 241. That isn’t a peaceful dispersion, and, while not 10,000 people, is still a massacre.
I just don’t understand how events like this doesn’t substantially taint your image of them, in the same sense the stolen generation policies (for my country, Australia) are massive stains on my countries’ histories that we havent fully contented with.
But trying to relate it to what I my original comment, I worry about denials of mistakes that countries have made, results in failing to see their current mistakes. In particular aswell, seeing what would normally be considered a grave immoraility, to be seen in a much more positive light because its anti western imperialism.
What I am saying aswell, is this also distorts the truth of events or facts, in a similar manner to an average western citizen’s truth because of their aversion to china.
I think they aren’t the aggressor in the China/USA relationship. The US is in their “backyard” and has clearly surrounded them, and China is naturally nervous about it
Name one major western critic of china you agree with.
I’ll name a critic of the US: the cuba embargo for the past 70 has been a major disaster, and any deaths from economic collapse isnt due to cuba’s socialism, it is instead because of the US.
Do that, I’ll be far more willing to believe you.
Would technically also, and indeed commonly go the other direction, but please .ml, stop navigating the world based soley on whether the west supports/is against something
When you believe truth is only dependent on who says it (west=lies, not west=truth) you start believing nonsense like china has not flaws, or events with verifiable footage (1989 TS) are exaggerations/a western lies.

Net losses im afraid. That said the recent anti flock movement is promising