![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
the first two certainly appear to be doing it, but without context, it is hard to say. the third explicitly said one is worse
the first two certainly appear to be doing it, but without context, it is hard to say. the third explicitly said one is worse
deleted by creator
there is a lot to unpack there, but i donāt see the point. you said you were done so ā¦ leave.
I assumed everyone here had a similar level of reading comprehension. that was my mistake. have a nice night.
my whole comment was a hypothetical. soā¦ bye.
your mockery still doesnāt change the facts
ok. you look up hypothetical, and we can meet back here to discuss!!
in this hypothtical, those are the other two options. I would know: I wrote the hypothetical
your mockery doesnāt change whether itās a voter suppression tactic
I wasnāt arguing about the definition of genocide. itās a pretty outlandish hypothetical for you to be worried about that.
I think we just have different ideas of what voter suppression looks like.
if on election day, an hour after teh polls open, everyone calls the election for cornel west, and people say āyou can vote for one of the genocidal maniacs, but it wonāt matter. they canāt possibly winā, no one would characterize that any way except voter suppression.
if you have something to say, say it. I donāt care for your interrogative style.
say what you want. your guessing game is boring.
is it really a surprise that the LGBT would be excluded from recognition based on the dominate cultures of the time?
I donāt know what this is supposed to mean
he didnāt have a problem with any of it.
the poem starts āfirst they came for the communistsā
theses are all in the same thread? can you link it?