

Have you tried to destroy a Nokia 3310?. Case closed.


Have you tried to destroy a Nokia 3310?. Case closed.


[bums], [boobs], [other]


That kinda depends on where in the world you are. In Europe we have strong protections such that users need to consent to that type of testing (remember those annoying cookie banners? well what do you think they’re for 😉). But if you’re in the US… well, my apologies.


Randomised is not what makes it ethical. It’s what makes the AB test statistically valid such that you can test your hypothesis.
Ethical would be to run the test, gauge the click through rate to checkout to find a winner, then for all those you charged the higher price to give them a discount code such that everyone gets the product at the same price. What you’re testing is the click through rate of a price advertised further up the funnel.
Maybe later you can say ok the rates didn’t drop off people seem ok with the higher price. Higher price for all. Or not as the AB test would reveal.


This is UhhhmuuuhriKa! Hoo-rah.
USA USA USA!
🥲




I vote Democrats. Yes. Because they’re any better. 🥲


And they should rightly ban sales to the US. Check mate orange man.


Err, sir. This is a pile on / anti Google thread. Please take your comments elsewhere. Please and thank you.
Pitchforks! Get yer pitchforks. Four for a paaand!


Even under the Biden administration the Tiktok ban was nothing more than protectionism. A non US social network corrupting US kids? GTFO only US social networks can do that.


Can’t compete? Ban it!


Thank you for the detailed analysis. I really want to… but the rational side of me says I shouldn’t 😆.


How does one short a stock? Like what is the process? Do I need a special broker?


What’s a typical lock in period?


OK. So in that case the easiest thing to do is to hand out fines.


Do the EU have the capability to fork it?


A judge that Musk and Trump have bought? Or a real judge? Do you have any of those left?
Universal free health care.