Read more carefully:

The president can issue executive orders pursuant to a grant of discretion from Congress, or under the inherent powers that office holds to deal with certain matters which have the force of law.

Executive orders are limited to exercising powers already granted to the President by Congress or the Constitution. The President cannot just make up new laws. This is basic stuff that should have been explained to you numerous times if you’re American.

Why should we listen to you and not Sotomayor?

How would he “illegally introduce a new law”? He could issue a decree but it would be meaningless because nothing gives a president the power to make laws.

Not if they’ve been forcibly removed from office.

He’s due to die of natural causes any day now, so we’ve got that going for us.

And yet you can still buy phones with headphone jacks. Because there is demand for them. The reason you didn’t see many is because the demand is a lot less than what Lemmy users would have you believe.

I see from your own argument that you were a Trump supporter in 2016. Not someone I’d listen about anything.

From the dissent:

Whether described as presumptive or absolute, under the majority’s rule, a President’s use of any official power for any purpose, even the most corrupt, is immune from prosecution. That is just as bad as it sounds, and it is baseless

When the foremost observers of the fascist cabal say their ruling is “just as bad as it sounds”, I will take their word for it.

Presidents can’t pass laws any more then you or I can. Even Trump isn’t insane enough to think he can.

I found 8 brands of DVD±R discs—none of them Sony—before I stopped counting. If you think one company stopping production is going to stop people from using physical media, or that demand hasn’t been falling for years, YOU are the one who’s badly out of touch.

Let me spell it out for you: as long as there is demand, someone will find a way to make money filling it. No company, no matter how evil it is, can remove a product category from the market just by leaving the market. Suggesting that a company choosing to stop making a commodity product is an attempt to prevent you from having access to said product is nonsense no matter what company and product you’re talking about, because such a plan could never work.

Or… they’re stopping production because there’s very little demand. Nah, that can’t be it.

Damn, that’s some Qanon-level shit.

I think it means something similar to YOLO.

Seems to me it’s mostly complaining about Google.

Asking “who still uses $thing”, where $thing is the most popular thing in its category, is peak Lemmy.

Having taken both of those drugs, I have to ask: what’s wrong with that?

Surely it should be “cleaned the bin”, right? Dialect issues complicate things but the basic problem seems to be that the joke is just ungrammatical.

“Accused” adulterer? The fuck? That’s a matter of public record.

But the one in your pocket is fine?

Same general idea, yeah.