

Even without external libraries, it routinely comes up with solutions that are at least 3-4x the complexity and LOC than how I would implement it.


Even without external libraries, it routinely comes up with solutions that are at least 3-4x the complexity and LOC than how I would implement it.


Do Wall Street next.


Looks like it doesn’t know shit about me. Just that I am on an iPhone and my general location from the IP. Not surprising at all.
Maybe this is more thrilling for android users?


Most people have learned by now, that “lines of code“ is a terrible metric for evaluating productivity. Why are we doing the exact same thing with AI tokens now?
If the conventions suck you have to break them. How else can you improve things?
map and filter are almost always inferior to generators and comprehension expressions in terms of readability. If you prefer the former, it’s just because you got used to it, not because it’s better.
That’s just because you’re used to it. The pythonic ternary is structured like spoken language, which makes it easier to read, especially if you nest them.
Is there an objective argument for the conventional ternary, other than „That’s how we’ve always done it!“?
I‘d love if I could just hit enter but the garbage it shits out unsupervised is just soo bad.