![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Really annoyed with all these articles written as if he’s going to be re-elected, or he suddenly skates on his convictions. That’s not how this works.
Really annoyed with all these articles written as if he’s going to be re-elected, or he suddenly skates on his convictions. That’s not how this works.
The streaming services are just operating the same way cable providers did now anyway. Worse in some cases.
Full circle.
No, it makes her polarizing because the viewers of certain media thinks she’s a fucking liberal who will literally sweep your house, take you gums, sell them, and give the profit to "illegals’.
This was a literal interpretation about her from ImfoWars. It’s a fucking thing. She won’t win.
You will just be downvoted from here on out because of who you are. Get right with something.
Not the point. She’s a Boogeyman for right-wing media.
Removed by mod
She’s vilified on Fox News as a Boogeyman literally every night of the week. WTF are you even talking about?
There be the facts, friend. It’s just how it works right now. Any time you figure out a better system you can get implemented, I’m all ears.
And yet, she’ll never win a presidential election because she’s too polarizing. There’s literally no other way to win here if somebody else steps in. Sad that people try to do good in their job as a public representative for their people, and just fucking can’t.
Edit to say: don’t just take my word for it. Ask Bernie Sanders. Did he win the presidency at some point? I just must have…,…
Not until October, and they won’t have enough time to do anything to fast track a damn thing depending on what happens. If it happens bettnow and then, it happens.
It does not state that AT ALL. I’ve read it twice. Please feel free to link me to my error.
No, Name recognition LOSES elections.
Intent is proven by subjective knowledge of what he knew about the law, and his internal staff have already testified he knew of the existing laws. There’s also recent recodings of him saying so and worrying about a crime being committed. He knew, and illustrated such, it’s not a hearsay case if he’s on tape, and others acted at his direction, which again, is already on record.
(queue Pink Floyd)
They’ll never do it, but they left that door open in some sense.
The dissent is not the prevailing ruling though. The other MAGA dip shits on the court just left the door open to anything for the next 6 months. All horrific derivatives of this timeline, sure. But they can’t stop the current administration apparently from doing the same shit without immunity until the next ruling. They’re just banking on the fact that Biden isn’t a gigantic piece of shit and will never pull the trigger on using any of these options.
I guarantee his team is sitting in a room right now coming up with ideas.
Depends entirely on what is done in the next 6 months…
That’s the way it reads. That’s also why they waited until the absolute last moment to release this ruling. It gives the current President unparalleled power. Will it be used in a meaningful way? I doubt it.
Well, gee. I guess let’s all piss ourselves and start fear mongering with articles written from the perspective of it already happening.
Polls are dog shit anyway. He was leading in the same manner last time around and lost. He’s not going to win.