Probably point to point WiFi, either for an office in LoS or for a wISP.
If they’re super progressive they might also be letting some hobbyists put a LoRA rig up there.
Probably point to point WiFi, either for an office in LoS or for a wISP.
If they’re super progressive they might also be letting some hobbyists put a LoRA rig up there.
The problem here is that who owns a data center isn’t a matter of breaking the law. It’s only if the data center starts breaking the law, and only then can the lawmaker share that the law is being broken and by whom. It wouldn’t give them carte blanche to go out and say “Microsoft owns that land”.