

there’s no such rule
there’s no such rule
Syngas, a mixture of CO and H2
It’s university press department stuff. That’s always shitty pop-science communication.
Then again, it works, as people post that to fora, instead of the actual research. And popularity, not quality, of work brings grants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetogen is a more promising technology in my opinion. It also does not require high pressures or temperatures, has been proven to scale to tons of co2, and uses much less energy than this paper.
This paper has the advantage of not needing a high concentration of co2 in the air. But on the other hand, such sources are readily available as a by-product of industry.
I’m happy to stay in my weird little corner.
Plenty of reasons for someone to want to start over completely. I would’ve liked that to still be possible.
Everyone on lemmy is always in disagreement.
In the context of this tweet most important differences are:
SQL is a language for querying databases.
Most common used databases are relational databases. With relational databases you can setup, well, relations and constraints.
Imagine you have 2 tables (2 excel sheets) one with people, and one with home ownership. You can set the following constraint: (1) each person shows up only once in the people table. And the following relation: (2) every home owner must refer to an existing person in people table.
When modifying the table contents, the system checks if no constraints or relations are violated.
Excel, just like a badly designed relational databse, would, for example, have no problem with duplicate people, or home ownership referring to non-existant people.
Or mongoDB 🙄
Probably something bespoke/legacy.
Depends on your personal connections.
Aand, it’s gone.
the EU would contribute €50 billion with the rest pledged by “providers, investors and industry.”
make our own production more competitive and enable better salaries overall.
That’s the topic of this post: due to it’s central steering EU became technologically (and in a few decades economically) irrelevant. It doesn’t know how to make 21st century things. Tarrifs don’t help with that problem, au contraire. Nor does a national social security system. The latter does make sure that everyone’s quality of life degrades about equally fast.
That I know, I live in Belgium.
I wonder what successful capitalisation of that would look like?
That’s something EU countries are better at than the US and on which it should capitalise
What does that look like?
Some things like image recognition, text classification, are way way easier using pretrained transformers.
As for generating code, I already used to spent a lot of time chasing bugs juniors made but can’t figure out. The process of making such bugs has now been automated.
That, I think, is a symptom not a cause.
The cause is societal: the EU thinks that innovation should come top down. By giving established corporations subsidies, and a large administration that steers everyone every step of the way. To make sure nobody does anything out of the ordinary.
That works if you want to improve car crash safety by 5%. But, ofcourse, that doesn’t work for true, novel ideas. Concensus being antagonistic to novelty.
And it’s not solely a “bad politicians” problem. A majority of Europeans are simply afraid of change, want their 9-to-5 job to look exactly the same for their whole life. The elected reflect their electorate.
Too bad the world changes regardless of you participating.
Some do, some don’t
Ah yes, politics as a driving force for technological innovation. This time it’ll work. 😒
A spectrum analyser?
An engraved leatherman multitool. Just so usefull and indestructible.