![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://slrpnk.net/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeddit.de%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fb4871535-c973-4496-aa73-9b36d14a03ee.png)
But it is a heavily commercialized drug backed by tradition and a huge industry
But it is a heavily commercialized drug backed by tradition and a huge industry
I think its because most of the flattening of the income mainly touches the 99% because the income taxation isn’t that effective for owning people as they often get their money from owning stuff instead of earning a salary
From my understanding the big copyright owners basically have a stranglehold on youtube when negotiating how youtube should handle copyright stuff. The current copyright law was not designed to accommodate platforms such as youtube so if they don’t do as the copyright owners say it could result in a long court battle resulting in a decision that youtube itself is the one violating the law for being the one hosting the non-licensed content on their platform.
Not a lawyer and don’t even live in the US so i might not be the most reliable source on this though.
oh no anarchy chess started leaking again
Imagine getting ticketed for playing your accordion over the speed limit