I just put Windows in a quarantine, if I bother at all.

please don’t hurt the children.

me too

and it goes HARD

The dark time before time existed.

Actually, I believe it should be possible (albeit horrendously slow) by memory-mapping the disk to address space.

They are quiet quitting, in other words.

Honest question, why don’t we just let them secede if they want to?

the first orb brings you to the first level

Cannot confirm.

I use google maps regularly, and it mostly works fine.

However, google search engine (and youtube recommendations) have gone on a steeply downhill rollercoaster ride. Nowadays, I have difficulty researching even the most basic topics on Google, because it is so clustered with ads that I cannot tell anymore whether any website is genuine or trying to scam me.

We need a google that uses AI/ML to hunt and de-rank the 1800 word essay web pages that answer the question, “how long should you microwave a baked potato for?”

“In 1863, county cork in Ireland, Shamus O’Toole created the world first commercial potato farm. He’d go on to…”

Exactly what it feels like if I’m asked to “write an 700-word article” somehow. Most of it is just filler material, really.

I am in strong support for this. 48 V makes a lot of sense. It could be used even outside cars, like ICEs or other applications.

Edgy comment here but:

In another thread we were discussing AI-generated CSAM. Thread:

https://feddit.de/post/6315841

You would probably agree, then, that such material is not problematic, because even if it looks like CSAM, and it quacks like CSAM, it is not CSAM, therefore we don’t have to take it seriously or regulate it in similar ways that we do regulate actual CSAM, if I continue your logic, no?

I believe that at a certain point, “agency” is an emergent feature. That means that, while all the single bits are well understood probability-wise, the total picture is still more than that.

It makes sense to me to accept that if it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then it is a duck, for a lot (but not all) of important purposes.

I disagree. This is no meaningful talking point. It doesn’t help anyone in practice. Sure, it clears legal questions of responsibility (and I’m not even sure about that one in the future), but apart from that, making an artificial distinction between a human and a looks-and-acts-like-human, provides no real-world value.

Probably even if the data is incomplete or fragmented, humans can still draw value from it.

Bullshit.

It should instead read:

“Humans were stupid and taught a ChatBot how to cheat and lie.”

Yeah well then. Classroom evolution by selection for superstition at its finest.

Yep. Just that lots of republicans aren’t being genuine. A lot of them are being christo-fascist, and they want to bend everyone to their will.

Some people don’t see happiness as valuable.

Some people only value the harm they inflict on others.