Doesn’t anyone here know that the Death Note (1) curses all those who use it with misfortune and (2) will trap your soul in limbo after use?
Nah, I’m good. Tweezers and a matchstick.
Doesn’t anyone here know that the Death Note (1) curses all those who use it with misfortune and (2) will trap your soul in limbo after use?
Nah, I’m good. Tweezers and a matchstick.
Did you see Mozart’s new concerto?
Everyone’s speculating so I’ll put in something concrete:
About 3 months ago, r/wholesomememes mods clamped down on karma-farm bots as hard as they could…
causing no new posts to appear for two entire days.
Hey there friends! It’s only been a few days since we started cracking down on the spam bots and excessive reposts that have been plaguing r/WholesomeMemes - and now there is nothing left! –mod
Did somebody say Inferno?
Getting mangoed and eating a stone.
its 3am and i laughed my ass off. why?
Master manipulator. Needs to be contained
Make your data useless or wrong.
More passively, there’s probably an oddly large amount of John Does born on January 1, 2000 ;)
More offensively, anti-image-gen data poisoning such as Nightshade exists. It’s well-defended against IIRC so hopefully someone can Cunningham’s Law correct me. And this is also more solo of a movement (as opposed to gaining mass support for something)
https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/327:_Exploits_of_a_Mom
SQL sanitization joke. Won’t affect most databases today.
I love all the pleasantly deep answers in this thread.
For my input: I’m everything I ever was, all at once.
You know how lenses refract over each other at the optometrist? Or how colors combine when you stack transparent cups in the washer? That’s me. I have parts from everyone I ever met, and parts from everyone I ever was. There’s no mask, even if I focus on one part of the mosaic in a meeting vs. another when I nerd out w/ a buddy – it’s all equally me.
I’m not Shrek though. Onions have layers, but I’m prismatic glass, chips and dips and all.
NOOOOOO HOW DID I GET SHITTYMORPHED ON LEMMY
Bad linked article. Judging by the amount of sets of three bullets
along with the “in conclusion” prepositions and not-very-useful-but-broad headings, it was written by AI. :(
Most online sources about this Schopenhauer suggestion seem to be either AI-generated, mildly superficial (i.e. basically only talks about Schopenhauer’s mom calling him an annoying intellectual type), or MBA-manipulator-esque (e.g. Get Rich! 48 Laws of Power! Buy Today!)…
which is a bummer since scaling humility up and down can be a really useful instrument to get things done. Just be agreeably approachable, but be careful if you outshine others, especially if ego gets in the way. Idk, i wish there was a more compelling source for this
Soooooooo! How’d the exam go?
Nah. Marry me.
Not sure about the latter, but NZT was the focal “smart” drug in Limitless (a show on the premise “this drug makes u smart but if u stop taking it bad stuff happens”)
For those who jump around too much like I do, remember:
Not that in particular, but design often comes down to the function f(keywords the branding people like) = very same-looking things. Yay trends.
A lot of fashion companies wanted to be “simple. bold. modern but ready for the future.” Now all their logo fonts are basically the same. It’s also why everyone loves Futura.
With websites, brand people pick the keywords “calm, professional, modern, reliable” and end up with blue so much that it’s the most common website color. So I’m not surprised that the web designers in question picked something “friendly” and “modern” like some font you’d imagine would go well as white text on a matte or charcoal background.
Same reason why I see so much Comfortaa on slideshows (alphabetically near the start of the font list, and f(modern, smart) = title font)
Okay, what were your last ten hyperfixations? (˵ •̀ ᴗ - ˵ ) ✧
And not to hang up on superficial stereotypes but metal is sophisticated too – a lot of the voicing/structure/styling is so classical-and-jazz that, with instrument switches, it can be indistinguishable. Don’t get me started on trying to claw my way through metal time signatures
Case in point: Dmitri Shostakovich - String Quartet 8 (guitar version)
First, imagine a number in JavaScript. (Bit of a nail biter here, huh?)
let i = 5
Then, we will construct an incrementor. This is really simple: here is the method.
eval()
.[]["filter"]["constructor"]("return i+1")()
eval()
by using+[]
as 0,+!+[]
as 1, and implicit conversions as ways to create strings. For example, ‘false’ is(![]+[])
, so ‘f’ is(![]+[])[+[]]
.[][ (![] + [])[+[]] + // f ([![]] + [][[]])[+!+[] + [+[]]] + // i (![] + [])[!+[] + !+[]] + // l (!![] + [])[+[]] + // t (!![] + [])[!+[] + !+[] + !+[]] + // e (!![] + [])[+!+[]] // r ][ ([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // c (!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+ // o ([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+ // n (![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // s (!![]+[])[+[]]+ // t (!![]+[])[+!+[]]+ // r ([][[]]+[])[+[]]+ // u ([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // c (!![]+[])[+[]]+ // t (!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+ // o (!![]+[])[+!+[]] // r ]("return i+1")()
let i = 5; // haha yay [][ (![] + [])[+[]] + // f ([![]] + [][[]])[+!+[] + [+[]]] + // i (![] + [])[!+[] + !+[]] + // l (!![] + [])[+[]] + // t (!![] + [])[!+[] + !+[] + !+[]] + // e (!![] + [])[+!+[]] // r ][ ([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // c (!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+ // o ([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+ // n (![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // s (!![]+[])[+[]]+ // t (!![]+[])[+!+[]]+ // r ([][[]]+[])[+[]]+ // u ([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // c (!![]+[])[+[]]+ // t (!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+ // o (!![]+[])[+!+[]] // r ]( (!![]+[])[+!+[]]+ // r (!![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+ // e (!![]+[])[+[]]+ // t ([][[]]+[])[+[]]+ // u (!![]+[])[+!+[]]+ // r ([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+ // n (+[![]]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+!+[]]]+ // ' ' ([![]]+[][[]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+ // i (+(+!+[]+(!+[]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+[+!+[]]+[+[]]+[+[]])+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+ // + +!+[] // 1 )() // no virus i swear. execute arbitrary code in your browser console.
Anyway, that’s just everyday JS work. It’s like step 5 after resizing the button, but a bit before centering the div.
based on this. some translation methods done differently.