They could be meaning it in a UK kind of way. They have anti-social behaviour orders and such. Slightly different meaning than someone who doesn’t like people.
Nah, they mean idiots who don’t understand probability.
We desperately need a third party review system with legitimate consequences.
You’re agreeing with something I didn’t state. I’m not defending the idea of introducing bugs through bad code and then blaming others. I think the way Linus responded to that was the issue.
I don’t think I am missing the forest. There’s not an issue with the idea of correcting a developer, but there is an issue in the way the correction was carried out. Just because something behaves “better” after punishment doesn’t mean the punishment was good. Ends justifying means and all.
“An oldie but a goodie”… What?! This shouldn’t be celebrated. What an absolutely unacceptable way to behave. Shame on anyone encouraging this.
If your interview involves telling me a username is “something you are” rather than “something you know”, I’m running away from that job as fast as I can.
Great looking font, but I’m not sure I can justify $75 for it.
#2 is a dangerous assumption!
“The two-day poll found that both Trump, 78, and Biden, 81, maintain the support of 40% of registered voters, suggesting that Biden has not lost ground since the debate.”
From the survey you linked.