I think they would, since once UK joins any other state considering leaving can just be shown UK’s example if she had joined EU, it could be said it was with tail between her legs.
I think they would, since once UK joins any other state considering leaving can just be shown UK’s example if she had joined EU, it could be said it was with tail between her legs.
Gave me a good chuckle
I was confused for a second what does 8AM have to do with a headless creature, before I figured out what it means.
Now that brother, is storytelling.
I read through a play store about app, they never mention it’s end to end encrypted. So potentially they read everything including passwords and other personal info, probably sell it to be fed it to some AI model while also building a very nice advertisement I’d for you.
Assuming you are in India, what’s wrong with WhatsApp? I seem to remember every tom, dick and Harry uses WhatsApp. I’m not a Facebook fan and not advocating that whatsapp is best, just if you have to spill your beans, better to do them only to one company is my thought direction.
Hahaha sick burn.
Amen
Well he was 69% of all traded volume… nice!!
Considering how strict he is, doubt they’re getting out of prison soon.
I think these days that’s the rule, if it piques your interest but you have some trouble understanding headline, you may just click on the article
Wow what a spam discussion, posting same thing from the original post again.
Problem with Modi is not his failures. Problem is with opposition parties that are willing to stick to inaction, refuse to abandon Gandhi Family elitism, keep face of opposition a person that gets basic facts wrong on a weekly level. If I was in India voting, I don’t even know if I have an alternative.
CPI, BSP, SP, AITC, TDP are all worse than INC. NCP still better but can’t get to national politics and AAP that promised a different more new-age way of governing is now governing basis the same useless policies, leaves me hopeless.
So if not BJP then who? Thank god i guess i don’t have to vote.
I Should’ve read the article, it doesn’t belong here
How do you think they’re detecting what to sensor, how are they censoring it?
I guess fuck apple. They knew legislation and they had 2.5 years. If they can’t meet its their problem, pay fines or make usb-c iPhone.
So the way these thieves work most of the time, they don’t know what to do with stolen items or how to liquidate them, so they’ll sell everything that they have to a bit more sophisticated criminal who knows how to liquidate stolen items and knows buyers of everything. Ideally when they steal a phone they don’t care what phone it is, they’ll sell it to their middleman, middleman will pay probably pennies on the dollar since it’s not an iPhone and street level thief wouldn know it’s value, middleman will probably sell it to someone that will gut it and take components out.
In this case, thieves just be new to the game or amateurs.
I’m not saying storing potential energy doesn’t work, it works and even though we lose some energy in conversion it’s still better than chemical batteries. No question there, my point is simple, we don’t have enough infrastructure to cover the world’s baseload demand by releasing stored energy. We need something that can produce baseload power 24x7. Geothermal and tidal(debatable but close enough) are the only viable renewable energy sources we have that run 24x7 and they’re not enough to cover the world’s energy demands. Adding PSEH doesn’t cover it either. We need something more and nuclear (fission or fusion) are the only other options that don’t emit CO2.
Dams are a whole another story ecologically but even leaving that aside, we are talking 200-300GW capacity currently in the world for PHES, even if you construct damns on every possible lakes, estimates are around 1000GW that world can build. World currently consumes close to 8000GW on baseload. We won’t even cover 15% of baseload with PHES.
If you’re trolling with your storage as magical solution keep trolling.
Missing article was here It didn’t contain much other than dates it was filed and plaintiffs information. Which is a standard practice anywhere.
In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages.[14][15][16] At the time of the suit’s filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had, “been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions”. The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing, “false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency’s reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill”.[17][14][18][19]
The article is still up, Wikipedia calling ANI biased, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International
So not really sure, why the massive outrage. Removing intricate details from ongoing lawsuits is standard practice.
While the lawsuit by ANI demands that editors who made the edit claiming ANI as govt mouth piece be identified, Wikipedia hasn’t done it yet and the article is right about setting a dangerous precedent if high court forces Wikipedia to reveal the names. But at the same time article is biased and has misleading information such as > In an unprecedented move, Wikipedia removed the page from its platform on October 21.>
You can see some well noted examples of articles being removed before from Wikipedia here . So there is clearly precedent for removal of articles. I used love vox a decade ago, but now I see these half truths/partial stories are a commonplace and I’m happy to have ditched vox now.