Altruism is never going to be the way to get companies to do the right thing. Instead, making the wrong thing a financial liability is.
Altruism is never going to be the way to get companies to do the right thing. Instead, making the wrong thing a financial liability is.
There are no hard requirements for being president beyond those listed in the Constitution:
That’s it. The framers of the Constitution presumably felt being a convicted felon would be enough for an electorate (or the electoral college, at least) to simply not vote for that person.
Oh no.
Not undermine the legitimacy of the Court!
Those fucksticks did it themselves. Anything the Executive does to put it back on course is an improvement.
then paying off said pornstar to interfere with the election outcomes?
You forgot the most important part: Feloniously classifying those payments as “legal expenses.”
There’s an IDE drive in a landfill somewhere with 10BTC on it because I’m fuckwit.
Impeachment is the accusation and happens in the House. They draft “Articles of Impeachment” and pass them like any other bill, with a majority vote.
The Senate then holds a trial while the House provides a prosecutor of those charges. The Senate acts as a jury and, to convict, requires a “2/3rd majority of those present”
Trump, for example was impeached twice, successfully. The Senate failed to convict both times.
I admit, this news has made me add a note to re-download firefox on my work machine…
Consumer PCs are almost certainly not covered entities under HIPAA, nor is Microsoft in its role as an OS provider.
Even then, if this whole thing were to result in an inappropriate disclosure by a covered entity, the organization that processes the data would be liable, not Microsoft.
That’s like blaming the building contractor because you left the door unlocked and someone came in and stole your cat.
Fun.
From the article, the linked Swagger docs : https://web.archive.org/web/20240120071238/https://mycscgo.com/api/v1/docs/static/index.html#/
And a little more detailed account : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/how-this-security-bug-in-washing-machines-can-help-college-students-in-the-us-do-free-laundry/articleshow/110277923.cms
It looks like these laundry machines are controlled by a mobile app, and requests are routed through The Internet™. The flaw appears to be the web service presumes a user is only able to gain access to their API endpoints via the mobile app, which only exposes certain functions to a user.
Once authorized, though, there’s no further checks like oauth scopes or even user roles, to prevent someone from doing a little bit of lateral movement to admin-style endpoints.
Lazy. The machine makers should be ashamed.
Useless grandstanding. It will never make it out of committee. On the insane chance it did, Biden would immediately veto it.
But, if you want to keep track yourself, here it is: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/4296/all-actions?s=2&r=2
No lie … if they could make a chip that like … Shuts off cognition while I’m at the gym so I don’t have to experience it … I’d consider it.
I really hate working out.
Nothing. They’re behaving quite rationally.
You just have to understand that their motivation is not “successful governing” or “making the world better” but rather, “getting more money.”
When you view their actions through the lens of self-enrichment, they’re behaving quite normally.
Honestly, I read the judge’s statement as a sort of appeal to Trump’s ego and integrity. Like a, “Come on bro, you were the president, don’t make me throw you in jail,jackass.”
It’s mostly performative, so the judge can say he didn’t want to when he eventually gets has to.
Just call it “Grand Wizard” and get it over with.
My bad! I just assumed.
Nah. As a schedule I, it’s in the same category as things like meth. Tito your corner drug dealer ain’t telling the feds where he’s selling, right?
They’re pulling a Ron Swanson about “official acts”.
Remember when Ron won that female empowerment award and was giving Leslie a hard time? She said, “That’s not the attitude of an award winner.”
He replied, “Everything I do is the attitude of an award winner, because I have won an award.”
Not some random courthouse. Just the steps of the Supreme Court.
Decisions like this should have immediate consequences for those deciding. If you want to make the President above the law, well, enjoy your stay in Gitmo.
It’s a contract.
They give you some money now, and, instead of an interest rate and a term for repayment, they get a percentage of your future income for some period of time.
Particularly shitty ones continue even if you repay the original loan amount.
I think an “arms race” that forever expands the court – and thus dilutes the individual relevance of a single Justice – is a good thing.
A single Justice dying or retiring should not be the sort of thing to reshape the entire country.