edible_funk

I agree with him in general about AI but hot goddamn the man gives serious self-described philosopher/cult leader/grifter vibes out the wazoo.

What about mobile?

Yeah but that’s because they’re breaking the law and nobody’s enforcing consequences. I get what you’re saying, they do have effective immunity because the system is compromised, but they do not have legal immunity and are healing the law. If we course correct (we can’t, but maybe a fuckin miracle will happen) they’ll all be able to prosecuted under existing laws by judges and prosecutors that fulfill their oaths. It’s an ultimately meaningless distinction unless we course correct, but it’s worth pointing out for the sake of factual accuracy.

Trump said he wants the Panama canal, and Venezuela is on the way there.

No but they are all over your comments, it’s like you work for RT or something. You sure do repeat basically all their points ad nauseum.

Scratch a both sideser, find Russian agitprop. Every goddamn time.

It isn’t a matter of opinion though. Hateful ideologies promote anti-social behavior, in the actively harmful to social order context, not the I don’t like being around people context. They promote social discord which is objectively bad for social order and society at large. There are objective measures here. Not all viewpoints are equally valid, and the whole idea that they are is one of the less valid ones. You’re operating under some sort of legislation=ethics and morals framework that’s flawed in incredibly fundamental ways. Any ideology that violates the social contract cannot be protected by it.

And I disagree that anyone has the right to believe whatever they want. Nobody has the right to believe the earth is flat. Nobody has the right to believe in chemtrails, or any other objectively false thing. You’re entitled to an informed educated opinion, not to reject objective reality and replace it with your own.

Refusing to allow ideologies inherently harmful to society doesn’t have anything to do with what you just said. We’re having two different conversations. Also ideologies aren’t intrinsic characteristics and thus can’t have or be denied rights, so it’s weird to make that connotation unless you just don’t understand what I’m saying.

Removed by mod

Classic rusbot blaming Dems for things republicans do.

As a third party voter, you’re either really stupid or you know you voted for this.

What a bizarre bot.

Naw monoculture farming is incredibly harmful to the environment and farmers know it but do it anyway to suck that government welfare teat while voting to take away other people’s safety nets. Fuck farmers, bitch ass welfare queens ain’t feeding shit, throw most of it away and make corn gas to fuck the environment even more.

Should have let Sherman finish the job.

You talk like a chat bot. Stop defending nazis. You’re not defending the rule of law or any of that, you’re just defending nazis. Don’t do that. Supremacist ideology is incompatible with society as they expressly intend to destroy that society. It is always correct and right morally and ethically to remove anti-social ideologies. Legality is irrelevant.

This argument does not apply to anti-social ideologies such as white supremacy that are incompatible with society.

Paradox of tolerance. It’s absolutely self defense at the society level.

If there are no laws explicitly preventing the practice then all companies who can do it are doing it.

Weaponized psychology to create docile consumer drones.

It doesn’t seem like it sucks, it objectively fucking sucks and should be illegal.