I do this regularly. The „unfortunately“ part is not something I am willing to take ownership of and see it as a weakness of the platform. I also tend to be controversial in .world communities and I detest software that‘s trying to force me to behave in certain ways that are neither transparent, nor neutral in their judgment of my commentary.

That’s the same for up- and downvote balance. it’s bullshit. be it attitude or reputation.

Why am I forced to have certain voting patterns in order to be accepted as a trustworthy community member? That‘s arbitrarily authoritarian in order to subdue deviant behaviour without good reason or explanation before engaging in said community, which ux design displays up- and downvoting in the same manner? I‘m not being warned of such consequences for this arbitrary branding rule. Is excessive upvoting branded, as well? If so, in which way? If not, why not? It‘s dumb, that‘s what I‘m getting at.

Dunno man, I‘ve got the double red triangle exclamation mark for „very low reputation“. Certainly it „warns“ unsuspecting people and I had already at least one commenter, that mistrusted my commentary just for that. Cool. Cool, cool.

Don‘t have an account — do I also have an attitude, it doesn‘t show any publically?

Either way, branding users like that, intransparently, by machine logic, I certainly am not convinced.

First step, ignore posts from Hotzplotzn, randomname or Sepia accounts, as they are specifically created and active to paddle Western propaganda against their current antagonists, China and Russia. The accounts exist to manufacture consent, avoid.

Actually what? You stalked another user on another meme post about another topic to make no point at all. Are you a bit dim?

@Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml - what’s your defense?

Nobody ever said that they‘re all Nazis, not even the meme.

Also, you started by citing fiction to make a point using whataboutism.

You are not a sincere person.

What‘s your perspective on Trump‘s motion to increase and secure US rule over the Americas?

I’m not necessarily agreeing with the head chopping part on a general basis, but consider this:

If you become wealthy (which is a nebulous term, but w/e) in this system you automatically gain power over the life of other people, while you yourself break free from being forced into laboring for others. You are not going to spend it all on consumables, so you will likely use it to pay other people to do stuff for you, that you either can’t be bothered to do yourself or are not skilled to do yourself. So you’ll be able to live off of the labor of others, less fortunate. You are extracting value from them, maybe even creating some kind of dependency through the power imbalance.

TL;DR: Share your wealth or get fucked, parasite ;)

(and no, extracting value for your personal benefit is not sharing)

E: So, it’s more of: do you have the means to free yourself from labor, while at the same time you exploit the people that don’t have that freedom, then your wealth becomes a problem and through your wealth you do become a problem for the working class.

You‘re such a tool. So, how would you describe your lemmy post (and comment) efforts over the whole existence of this account? Looking at it a bit closer, one could come to the conclusion, that you are paid and supported by NATO-adjacent interests. Because it‘s literally all you do, all day, everyday, posting agitating stuff against the two big adversaries of the west. That‘s a really narrow window of interest. Are you and hotzplotzn best buds? Disgusting. Ever considered doing something with your life, that actually helps humanity progress and flourish, instead of propagating war efforts and manufacturing consent?

Sure alright, I got heated by your sad apathy. Explain the “Disingenuous” part, tho. What’s disingenuous about what I said?

Oh, suddenly you don’t care? The only thing, that doesn’t make sense then, is you commenting at all. Curiously you do, tho — with vibes-based political commentary. If you’re really so apathetic, may I suggest to you to stfu.

What I got from your form of verbal maneuvering (lol), tho, is that you are not only apathetic, but also ignorant.

That’s all very vague. Be more explicit. Many argue many things.

What is the ideology you’re hinting at? Communism? What is the body count of communism? Where do you think you’ve got that that narrative from?

To round out the picture, and because body count seems so decisive, we should include capitalism, right — as fascism, many argue, is a neccessary consequence of imperial capitalism protecting itself in crisis and it’s our current economic ideology and therefore an ongoing, systematic phenomenon?

What’s the body count of capitalism?

Many would argue we currently live by an ideology with a body count of double digit millions of excess deaths annually, through poverty & hunger, healthcare inequality, workplace deaths & diseases, environmental & climate deaths, structural violence, and of course war & imperial violence.

Not the same thing. Equating the far left and the far right is nonsensical, as horseshoe theory isn’t a real thing. Giving room for such thought only strengthens extreme right positions and is exclusively used to either distract from or downplay far right commentary or elevate liberal/centrist thought as the only acceptable path. It’s interestingly never used by people from the far left themselves.

Your’s either an ignorant take or one with an agenda, which is it?

The main difference is that fascism and racism are fundamentally destructive ideologies/traits, while tankie is just a derogatory term for folks on the far left used by people that think extreme left and extreme right are the same kind if evil. It’s a display of arrogant ignorance, congratulations.

So you remain with the use of the term illegal for human beings, gotcha.

I‘m sure you know that‘s a dumb comparison. And since you felt the need to post it, you likely agree with letting people die in the mediterranean sea. And since you felt the need to defend that, you likely are an ignorant racist. Are you?

You are. You are the loser.

Democratic centralism is a Leninist organisational principle of most communist parties, in which decisions are made by a process of vigorous and open debate amongst party membership, and action is subsequently binding upon all members of the party.

Democratic centralism

The organization of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is based upon the Leninist concept of democratic centralism.

Organization of the Chinese Communist Party

This propagandist is even copy and pasting the same NATO glazing on this reported event now, although it‘s off-topic.

Yo, hotzplotzn, ever thought about doing something good for humanity with your life? Maybe a job that‘s not agitating against perceived western adversaries? Maybe something that‘s not furthering the division of society or the aspired militarization of western nations?

are you a sex pest, too? or why do you feel the need to be that guy in this very situation?