Two boots: “left” and right.
davel [he/him]
All text lovingly hand-crafted with 100% organic em dashes.
| Pronouns | he/him |
| Datetime Format | RFC 3339 |
- 22 Posts
- 1.85K Comments
We eat what we can and what we can’t we can.
davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•The highlighted division and factions of Lemmy.English
1·24 days agoI wonder how James Rehwald and Lady Izdihar manage to survive on TikTok then.
Doubling down on feigned obtuseness, I see.
You can take the girl out of Reddit, but can’t take the Reddit out of the girl.
The same numerically. You’re not that obtuse, so is this a joke or are you a cringey debatelord?
social justice warriors
Okay boomer.
davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What and who is the antidote to Foundations of Geopolitics?English
9·1 month agoNot sure—I haven’t read any fascist manifestos. Maybe Blackshirts and Reds.
Dugin isn’t “Putin’s Brain” any more than Navalny was, but he is popular with some US & European fascists.
davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•If Lemmy let you follow/block websites, which would you follow?English
10·1 month agoThere are already dozens of decent feed aggregators, and I’m not interested in Lemmy tacking on functionality that’s superfluous to social media. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_feed_aggregators
Or do you mean follow or block posted links to sites? That functionality already partially exists at the admin level. We can block posts of URLs to specific domains. https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4514
There’s already a ticket for per-user URL blocklists: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4689
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
— A.A. member https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/03/23/same/


When Imperial forces take out your sandcrawler.
davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Would you join a Lemmy server hosted by your govt that requires an ID to post comments or content? (lurkers no ID required)English
12·1 month agoI believe we need dedicated spaces for political discussion that are not based on algorithms optimized for engagement (aka outrage).
So do we, which is one of the reasons why Lemmy was created, and why Lemmy does not have algorithms for rage engagement. Lemmy is all cost and no revenue, so there is no financial incentive for it to “maximize ‘engagement.’”
The first is a way to limit bots or bad actors from participating in discussions.
Where are the actually-existing the “bot problems” on Lemmy? While it could happen, I don’t think it actually is happening to any significant extent presently.
davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•How to keep avoiding Google when it hamstrings Freetube [Linux]English
17·1 month agoYeah, this is community rule 2. I’ll leave this up, but please refrain in the future, @ExtremeDullard@piefed.social.
Those states owning the means of production is exactly why bourgeois states call them authoritarian. The bourgeoisie are supposed to own the MoP, not the state.
Fewer casualties was not the real reason.
Bullshit that one pulls out of one’s ass isn’t “criticism.” It’s just bullshit.
Ji had the families of everyone in the picture held as hostages to their good behaviour.
Reddit-ass comment.

Reappropriation is a thing.







Thanks I h8 it.