![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/c0ed0a36-2496-4b4d-ac77-7d2fd7f2b5b7.png)
I love “unimplemented!”
I love “unimplemented!”
It’s she staying in the race just as the remaining candidate in case Trump can’t join the general election for judicial or health reasons?
I renounce Jesus Christ!
In particle physics beyond reasonable doubt means 5 sigma statistics.
This shit has been a thing in Germany for a while. Usually the controversy around the accusations of plagiarism cause enough trouble for the accused person, even if after investigation the claims turn out to be bogus.
If you heat things electrically you still generate waste heat. Think electrical stove and its bigger industrial counterparts.
Yes of course, but a lot of energy is currently also used for heating things in cooking steel, chemical industry, concrete, etc. Those processes need energy as heat and directly produce waste heat. I agree it’s probably still significant. It’s just wrong to reduce energy consumption to “making things move”.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but electrifying a process doesn’t automatically make it not produce waste heat, right?
Depends on the level of abstraction you’re looking at. Operating systems today are vastly more capable of organizing different provesses, distributing work amongst multiple CPU cores, CPU caches, etc. I guess the von Neumann architecture has just proven really successful in practice. And von Neumann machines require a certain set of capabilities in their OSes.
Maybe look at embedded systems, where we find a bit more variety. Things like DSPs or microcontrollers.
Some ai models perform at 4 bit resolution. Maybe there’s a chance?
There was a study on Facebook that showed that they could predict with between 80-95% accuracy (or some crazy number like that) your gender, orientation, politics, and so on just based on your public likes. That was ten years ago at least. What is this even showing?
Advocates diabolo: that a large language model can do it without extra training, I guess. The Facebook study presented a statistical model on “like space” while this study relies on text alone, a much less structured type of input.
I’m not saying it’s a good study. Just pointing out some differences.
The cult leaders in scientology are a pretty clandestine bunch.
There’s embedded rust for a few platforms. Using it on ESPs is fun