![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
“I told him, I said: ‘Pawpaw, you know, when people ask me how you’re doing I say, ‘Honestly, I don’t know,’” Jason Carter said. “And he kind of smiled, and he said, ‘I don’t know, myself.’” “It was pretty sweet,” he added.
“I told him, I said: ‘Pawpaw, you know, when people ask me how you’re doing I say, ‘Honestly, I don’t know,’” Jason Carter said. “And he kind of smiled, and he said, ‘I don’t know, myself.’” “It was pretty sweet,” he added.
While I like the idea, I can’t imagine it would pass a constitutional test. However, an age limit that kicks in only after a person has been in an elected position for X years probably could. This would allow an 81 year old that had never held office to run for the first time and not be discriminated based on age.
Except that Supreme Court justices are supposed to be seen as non partisan, and flying the flag in that manner, especially at that time, has a very specific partisan meaning.
🏴☠️ 🏴☠️ 🏴☠️
No the court room still smells like he shit has pants
Thanks past me!
Times Square Elmo ain’t gonna stand for that shit
5th avenue
“I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters,” Trump said
Who is making these idiotic decisions ?
The fun part is that China doesn’t allow most or the stuff that TikTok is famous for in China, limits minors to 40 mins a day and does not allow access from like 10pm-6am. It’s telling that they have no problem allowing the app to bypass those restrictions in other countries.
That’s literally what this is, just read the yellow parts for the cliffs notes
I thought it was PornHub’s Step Sister company…
Good thing we can choose to fund both
Funky towel!
You act like this Supreme Court is above completely throwing precedent out the window.