they don’t need to know what’s happening when a panel pops up on their phone, says touch the fingerprint scanner, and enrolls a passkey. it’s on the companies

also sort of https://xkcd.com/2934/

Bob Martin himself having moved to a different category

yeah but you still basically end up duplicating the internal structure of the react component but in a css file then.

there’s nothing definitive that makes one of those 3 options better, it’s all preference. any of them fit better than global css though

sure, but both of those are significantly better than a css file. tailwind tends to match the internal structure better, css in js tends to match the component structure better.

tailwind doesn’t have a runtime though, where css in js libs generally do. not that that’s a big point. the difference is mostly preference

it matches the component model of react etc

just to be clear since you said both again in different sentences, GUID and UUID are two names for the same thing.

I think that spec predates uuid4, it only mentions the time based/node based variants. 122 bits of auth token should be plenty, right?

the sheer unlikeliness of guessing that large a number, the original post is fake or something else is going on.

I’ve worked at several places that didn’t have formatters when I started. they did by the time I left. you can incrementally adopt them and if it’s automated most people at worst don’t care. advocate for things you want

reassignment and hoisting are the significant ones. behavior around this does just seem more intuitive than otherwise when it comes up, so I think telling especially new devs to use const arrow fn everywhere but classes is a reasonable rule

hate to break it to you but it behaves like a variable either way. function just behaves closer to a var variable. const fns are less like variables since no assignment. intellisense/devtools all show them just fine. it really is just a minor aesthetic difference on the definition

knowing the programming language you’re working in at a basic level is gatekeeping I’m ok with

semicolons? quotes? use a formatter and don’t think about it. I think js world has basically done this already.

const is simpler. why would I declare an array as let if I’m not reassigning? someone can look at it and know they don’t have to think about reassignment of the reference, just normal mutation. ts has the further readonly to describe the other type of mutation, don’t abuse let to mean that.

const arrow over named function? gets rid of all the legacy behaviors and apis. no arguments, consistent this, and no hoisting or accidental reassignment. the 2 places you should ever use named fn are generator or if you actually need this

they’re different files generally, the only client that will automatically request them is a debugger.

you turn them off because you don’t want to expose your full source code. if you would be ok making your webpage git repo public then making sourcemaps available is fine.

yeah, ofc it should only be a curated set of errors where the consumer can do something about it. unknown errors should just be opaque 500s

more directly, sqlite was originally for tcl which is why they share the semantics.

also I’d argue that sqlite is a bigger contribution than tk, but I suppose in a more roundabout way

it doesn’t matter how it was made once it’s secondhand since it doesn’t support the manufacturer

I suppose there’s people that bought the original item since it had resale value, but I really doubt that’s significant overall, especially at most thrift stores

I’m saying we weren’t taught when react was the way people wrote sites. if I was writing a site with pure html, css is great, especially modern css.

but if I’m already using react and their abstractions, opinions on that part aside, I’d personally rather lean on the react component as the unit of reuse. tailwind removes the abstraction that you don’t need, since many people in react tend towards one scoped css file per component with classes for each element anyway

at this point I’d be more inclined to say for many sites the api and data fetching things are the content and html+css is presentation. csszengarden is cool but I haven’t seen the html/css split help an end user, or really even me as a developer.

instead of using classes you just use whatever your ui library provides for reuse. stick a classname string in a variable and you have a class. use a component and it just contains all its styles.

unless you mean that if you look in the inspector you see a mess of classnames. I don’t have a solution there

shadcn is the primary one for react at least. they’ve done a great job filling the space where you’re trying to build up a design system but don’t want to start from scratch, but they’re great if you just want prebuilt components too

all the components build on something else like radix, and are pretty simple themselves. normally just the radix component with styles. Installing a component just copypastes the source into your project at configured locations.

if you’ve ever fought against something like mui to get it to fit design changes or change specific behavior, shadcn is great. at some point the extension points of a library aren’t enough, but if you own all the code that’ll never be a problem.

except we generally use higher level abstractions now, like component based frameworks. If you’re writing raw html with tailwind and no library you’re doing it wrong and css is a better fit.

well written straight css ends up building it’s own tree of components. if you’re using react too you’re either only selecting a single component (inline styles but have to open two files) or writing good css (duplicating the component hierarchy in css).

tailwind is just the former but better since it encourages using a projectwide set of specific sizes/colors/breakpoints and small scope, the two actual problems with inline styles after organization and resuse, which react etc solves.

I’m sure all of them are just cherrypicked hotfixes from main tho

repr is generally assumed to be side effect free and cheap to run, so things like debuggers tend to show repr of things in scope, including possibly exit

also then it behaves differently between repl and script, since repr never gets run. to do it properly it has to be a new repl keyword I imagine, but I still don’t know if I’m sold on the idea