Bill Gates during the early years, yes. But now, I thought he’s turned 180°.
Bill Gates during the early years, yes. But now, I thought he’s turned 180°.
is there any reason research you know of that supports this? I am interested in the idea of keep learning to prevent degrading.
yes, I am one of those who are also getting bored of it. But this doesn’t mean that I am part of the market that they targeted. They might me targeting certain segments or even service providers such as game developers or console makers etc. The technology is still in it advent stage so it is too early to say wether they are going to fail.
Sorry, I disagree with this kind of generalisation. To be rational, Just because you don’t want it, it doesn’t mean everyone else is on the same ship. I am very sure there are certain people who will benefit from this and want it.
I use encfs and sync it to dropbox etc. Then use gopass password manager to store password in the encfs folders. Not fully auto-integrated but good enough for me.
Very unlikely, If you read and refer to the article. The identity was stolen but the pic is a stock photo.
The two images at the top of this story are a stock photo and what KnowBe4 says is the AI fake based on the stock photo.
Just stop using YT altogether.
They should but easy to say than done. In the end they will return back to it if no better or at least equal alternatives are out there to fill the vacuum.
the methods used by thiefs to try and get access to your phone data.
It is not about accessing the data but to disassociate the current user from the phone so that the thief can reset the phone or/and it’s components for new users.
no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence
That’s very bold presumption. How can they be so sure of this, that any future models can’t tackle the issue? have they got proof or something.
Hey, I follow up your suggestion - come back and read the article. No doubt, a very engaging read. Thx.
thx.
thx.
anyone can tldr?
I have to admit that I downvote this because I have to google for a non-existent term ‘Faschists’. No heart feeling.
It would be silly to acknowledge US imperialism and ignore China’s Belt and road imperialism.
I don’t ignore China’s act. In fact I acknowledge both. It’s normal that some powerful countries would want to exert control upon others. The question is their methodologies and how long can they sustain the approval.
The only difference is those manufactured islands that are designed to expand China’s landmass
Yeah, none of the SEA countries are happy with this. But they’re dependent on the relationship and they don’t have the capacity to resist. The best they can do is, “We’ll solve this diplomatically”. I think what’s currently happen with Philippines with will set the precedence for the future as they have gone beyond just claiming the territory.
I wonder what you think about the Chinese concept of the “central kingdom”…
I don’t know much about this. need to read more on this.
BTW, in no such way that I say that I supported what China does. But I try to convey the sentiment towards them is not just one sided. You’re knowledgeable enough that you understand this, but some people are in denial that they think that the whole world is united to go against the oppressive China when in reality China has been slowly gaining support in non-traditional places such as in African continent for example (let’s not touch about it just to keep it short). If the best line of defence is by shouting ‘China is a fascist country’, like what sub-OP has done, that’s now not going to work for obvious reason.
And I think I need to correct my words earlier - For me, unlike the US, the Europe are still friendly in the way the treat their relationship with China. However, we can see that at one point, one has to take side, or least becoming neutral. These coming years we’ll be seeing more and more issues being brought up to set the tone for the future.
Man, no need to react aggressively. Why don’t you keep the discussion healthy by giving your arguments instead.
If you read my history, I am not even a Chinese. However I like to keep abreast of what happened around the world and discuss and give my opinion on wide area of subjects, simply to understand what going on around us. Of course some of my opinion are not always popular to certain communities, especially on certain issues like this, but I appreciate better intellectual response.
I stated before of ‘diplomatic and economic relarionships’ as that what usually dictate how the country move forward. In a simple words, the ASEAN governments don’t see China as a threat to their economic growth. This is different that the way EU see China - seeing as enemy that will directly jeopardise their economy. You just need to read the title of this post to simply acknowledge that.
Yes, the milk tea alliance will definitely disagree with me. In some Asean countries, democracy has been suppressed, e.g. in Myanmar and in notable but lesser extend and longer period in Thailand. We can see that China has been backing these countries and logically will be seen as enemy by the citizens that has been suppressed. However, I don’t think things would change much. The ASEAN leaders still consider China as important towards the stability of the region, and ASEAN has a policy to turn a blind eye on what domestically happens in its member countries, unless its very serious like in Myanmar. So, as long as each members remains friendly to each other, nothing much would change - business as usual.
I can imagine this kind of thought from the Europe and the US. But many of the countries in Asia, at least from South East Asia, don’t see it that way. Although some these countries have territorial disputes With China, diplomatically and economically they are very close. One of the big reasons is they have a policy of ‘enriching your neighbours’ where if the neighbouring countries are prosperous, then by ripple effect the country itself will prosper.
I know I’ll get downvoted for stating this, as it has always been before. My intention is just to explain that the world is bigger than what evolve around us, and not everyone thinks the same. It better to understand the complexity and study why rather than making a generalized statement.
For me that’s just envy. You define people based on what you don’t get.
You don’t seem to know what you are talking about. Are you a child or on a primary school or something? Read more.
He has dual citizenship - French and UAE.