

I read “Code was never the hard part” as “Writing the Code down is easier than the stuff you do before it (like Architecture, Design Patterns, Requirements) and after it (Testing, Troubleshooting, Refactoring, etc)”.


I read “Code was never the hard part” as “Writing the Code down is easier than the stuff you do before it (like Architecture, Design Patterns, Requirements) and after it (Testing, Troubleshooting, Refactoring, etc)”.
cachyos is also topdog on distrowatch, by a wide margin
distro memes should be updated for 2026. i.e. with cachy,bazzite,steamos.


One reason this type of promotion may be becoming more common is that connected cars give automakers a direct path to the driver’s screen.
“Wo ein Trog ist, da kommen die Schweine.”
quote from spoiler
a real sense of someplace “alien"
Yes. so much this!
Too often the aliens just feel like green humans, and the worlds are just “earth but only the deserts” or “earth, but more water”. I guess that’s because it won’t sell well if the audience can’t relate enough with the world and its inhabitants. But still…
Scavengers Reign
I liked the character writing, and I liked many of the scifi parts, but i was missing the “hard scifi” that the plot should revolve around in a scifi story. i.e. the futuristic stuff doesn’t affect the story much and the character arcs would have worked just as well in 17th century exploration story. Compare that to hard scifi like “the expanse” or “westworld”, where many parts of the story can only work because of the specific way the world works.
if you prefer soft scifi over hard sci, than Scavengers Reign is a strong recommendation.


“3,5 thousand” seems common in spoken language, but not in writing, afaik. I don’t know how common it is in english (and dialects), but in german it is.


i tried to use instagram a couple of times, and it felt exactly like that every time


pretty soon
people have been saying that for some time though
except RD it looks good.
For bluefast you could either take something with fast releases such as arch or fedora. Or something lightweight with faste boottimes, such as Peppermint or Bodhi.


I assume the judge told openai to hand it over?
Strong Dunning Kruger vibes
the irony lol


more users means, they should do much better than the ones with less users (assuming each user is worth the same/requires same infra).
at the worst case, a bigger org could just copy paste a smaller orgs system a couple times to get the exact same uptime, with same budget per user*. The benefit of bigger orgs is, that they can consolidate these separate system a big system that is more stable AND costs less. If this wasn’t true, we wouldn’t have big orgs in the first place**.
* yes, it is NOT the same budget for the users. You can’t JUST copy paste the system, you’d also need to think how you split it up. I know there are a million little things to nitpick here, but this can all be solved somewhat easily, and they wont change the overall argument.
** regulatory capture, lobbying, corruption and creating a monopoly could also be consider aspects of “consolidating into a bigger system”. This doesn’t mean why MS shouldn’t be able to be better, it just explains why they aren’t better.


how does it compare to other distros on the chart?
e.g. i can imagine that many military people us RHEL (which already is on the appropriate place on the chart).


They were all conscripted and when in that kind of situation (drafted by monsters) you just do not say no
at least werner von braun was a high ranking nazi. I am not sure about the others
And while being there you may also do everything that is possible to make the shit little less shit.
yes, you could argue, that slaves under werner von braun had better survival chances than else where. (I am not sure if that is true though)


I agree, but if my only choices are “copy-right law as it is” vs “abolish all forms of copyright law, including plagiarism”, I’d go with the later.
(I am only talking about “law” here. People and orgs should still boycott and denounce plagiarism.)


MSSQLMS is goat tho
kagi.