Doesn’t mean psychology can’t be ruined by AI anyway.

Don’t forget Rogers Place in Edmonton.

I just upgraded to 5700x to future proof my PC, lol

I would kinda like glasses that could display my heart rate and running pace, so I would not have to look at my watch.

I think it depends on whether you used the web interface or mobile app. Mobile app was more restrictive.

I found technical details of the private processing in this whitepaper: https://ai.meta.com/static-resource/private-processing-technical-whitepaper

It’s not just to watch the game, it’s to watch/listen to the streamer. It’s like a talk show.

Yeah, I guess the debate is which is the lesser evil. I didn’t make the original comment but I think this is what they were getting at.

If you aren’t allowed to freely use data for training without a license, then the fear is that only large companies will own enough works or be able to afford licenses to train models.

Since it’s processed on device they don’t (necessarily) need to transmit and store your conversations in some central location. I guess theoretically this could be done in a secure way.

Tape

I think you need a forest, a pulp mill, and a paper mill. The forest might be the hardest part in a lot of places…

Does getting ready to click on something count at user input?

I don’t think you are allowed to sell patent infringing products, even if you didn’t make them. The manufacturers may not be in the US so going after them could be more complex. I believe patents restrict rights to make, use, or sell.

No Candy Crush? Non-starter.

We need to grind for a sense of pride and accomplishment.

Imagine hiring a taxi without having your lawyer review the terms and conditions, lol

What is intelligence though? Maybe I’m getting through life just by being pretty good at predicting what to say or do next…

But you have to select if it was human or not, right? So if you can’t tell, then you’d expect 50%. That’s different than “I can tell, and I know this is a human” but you are wrong… Now that we know the bots are so good, I’m not sure how people will decide how to answer these tests. They’re going to encounter something that seems human-like and then essentially try to guess based on minor clues… So there will be inherent randomness. If something was a really crappy bot then it wouldn’t ever fool anyone and the result would be 0%.

How much could a tweet cost? $10?