Ars Technica’s How to install Windows 11 on supported and unsupported PCs, 24H2 edition says to use Rufus. I say to use the Swirl.

Debian is like the Unitarian Universalists of distros. “You’re here? You’re here! That’s great!”

Yeah, that’s probably a better phrasing.

People weren’t using them ambiguously, drive manufactures picked a non-standard unit to lie with on their boxes, and then tricked courts into going along with their shit because it was the old case of money vs truth.

I’ll assume you’re being intentionally obtuse because no one could actually be that dumb.

Unfortunately, I am not from the EU region, neither do I live in one

So, the GDPR doesn’t apply to you. So, you’re probably SOL?

The thing that bugs me is how any order given to subordinates is a use of executive power, right? So that’s immune. But say the subordinate considered refusing an unlawful order. Why, then would they decide to refuse the order when the president could also choose to pardon them for any crimes they committed during the execution of the unlawful order?

They’re already trying it on appeal, though. Sure, they’re applying federal precedent to a state case, but why would Trump’s team let stop them?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw4yp9g7ynwo

Oh, neat. 😢

Can they, though? I’m sure there’s some 200 year old policy about having all ballots cast into the straw hat behind the vending machine on a Thursday afternoon between 3 and 5, in order to count.

Unless you change the laws to say you can! Which was the point of the above comment.

His post-grad ghost writers (“clerks”) said that.

She continued, “don’t they know, we could just hand this country to Putin, right now! They’d buy it! They’d fucking buy it and call us patriots for our treason, just fucking like last time!”

Used to be, “the tragedy of the commons” didn’t quite so literally mean an attack on the common resources.

That’s not very reassuring, we’re still only one computer bug away from that situation.

Presumably she wasn’t identified as a violent criminal because the facial recognition system didn’t associate her duplicate with that particular crime. The system would be capable of associating any set of crimes with a face. It’s not like you get a whole new face for each different possible crime. So, we’re still one computer bug away from seeing that outcome.

It’s an extremely compelling product story full of market segmentation advertisers dream of!

H100 isn’t $40, it’s $40,000. You’re making the Bloomberg Mistake: it costs $4,000,000,000 - four billion.

I can’t wait to see what clownshoes nonsense way he absolutely fucks this one up, but that’ll take a lot of liquidity he probably doesn’t have access to unless he gets the $45bn Tesla payout.

How in the fuck did you find that, and where is the rest of the text on the page?

https://libraryofbabel.info/bookmark.cgi?xruxssyjn.wudtc241

That, finally, explains the pink sauce lady!

Back in my day, we called that “hard-mode plagiarism.” They can’t punish you if they can’t find a specific plagiarized source!