So you might have a script that does stuff as a library, and it should get environment variables and other info from the calling script. You use the same script for doing one off stuff on different computers.

So you make it do something slightly different or make it set it’s path and look into the current folder when you run it directly. This change in logic could be in a few points in the script.

Now think about this, you have logic that doesn’t make sense when run directly, but you need it to be a library.

You have multiple name=main statements in some of your functions

Yeah, and you assume other drivers won’t drive in the wrong lane

Average sysadmin origin, thank you for your service

My workplace barely groks opportunity cost on their main product, and I’m not responsible for the IT. When it breaks constantly, I say “yeah we know it breaks like this, get them to fix it.”

Not my circus, I just stamp the tickets.

What do you use for video calls with screen share?

My coop uses teams and I want to move them off it.

So now my clients will have a harder time engaging with my product. Great.

It will be funny if they try, because plenty of presentation setups will break

“nice shoes, wanna fuck?”

Gotta say, if you are a bit spicy and they are too, if your shirt matches their shoes this might result in a date.

pass by phone

That’s a ticket I would go and overnight mail a pre configured IP KVM

That’s probably just to compensate for grip strength or range of motion with the knife.

By backwards do you mean point near the elbow? If so you can get more leverage that way.

Absolutely op is trash either way.

You are using an AI tool to check if things are AI generated without considering that PUBLIC AND HISTORICAL IMAGES ARE USED IN THE TRAINING DATA.

I hate AI as much as the next guy, your lack of critical thinking is more of a blight on humanity.

I am really wondering if he’d ever said anything before that tipped off Trey and Matt

The researchers are doing the composing, not the organoid. The organoid is just existing.

Interpretations are intentional, transformative etc.

Automating that is not.

I’m referring to completely involuntary movements… Characterising any involuntary, debilitating phenomenon as intentional or artistic is gross.

Characterising involuntary but normal phenomenon as intentional or artistic is maybe a little less gross, but still asinine.

I understand why you think it’s offensive, that’s fine.

It’s about as close to composing as transcribing the twitches of someone with Parkinson’s.

About as respectful as well, if the researcher is the person characterising this process as composing.

Managers.

Alright you have no idea what’s going on