I like this guy. If you’re into retro computing, Ben Eater, who was mentioned in this video, has an awesome channel too: one of his video series involves making a computer from scratch on a breadboard using one of these bad boys (65c02, I think)
I do. I recently bought a new phone and this was non-negotiable. My headphones are good and my desire to bring Bluetooth and batteries into the equation is a cool zero at most.
“Oh my god, who cares!”
Huh? Admittedly XML is a joke, but if that’s not it…
People spend one-third of their lives asleep. What if employees could work during that time … in their dreams?
Great The Onion stuff. Hard to make this shit up.
What was the point of spending years as a productive administrator, making tens of thousands of edits and logging thousands of actions, to implode the whole thing over a pointless argument on an RfA talk page?
People do weird things. Mood disorders, (develop-/)mental disorders, personality disorders, extreme cases of having a shitty day, or just being a twat.
What is really fucked up isn’t just the meltdown, but the insinuation they did this to fuck with someone else, this Beeblebrox guy. That’s not very hoopy.
“We prefer the term progressive unlock”
Yeah, why don’t the users just pick a better option in this monopoly.
If you want a specific anti-facebook thing, as others mentioned, you can just make one. It’s still all over every tech-related community, though - this thread being one example.
Well yes. Unfortunately that just reminds me of Beavis and Butthead so it’s not really evil enough.
Basically all of them. Lemmy etc. are basically 90%+ techies, Facebook is pretty much going to be widely hated here no matter where you go.
[chuckles evilly in Norwegian]
Turns out arbitrary code execution is actually great(!)
Funny, but unironically a pretty good idea.
It’s criminally underutilized. Of course, one reason is that it’s hard to TDD a moving target. Since it’s also hard to get people to actually fucking specify things in a lot of real world cases, it’s just one more thing you ought to do, but aren’t allowed to.
This, but unironically. That is basically exactly how it started (after “J#” IIRC), minus a few wrinkles ironed out because if you’re reinventing the wheel, might as well try not to make the same flaws the old one had. Of course things branched out from there and C# has been a very different beast from Java since the 2000s.
Ha! Get rekt, Meta.