I guess reading comprehension is that bad. Here was the rest of the comment:

The justification for attacking them is that they need to be stopped before they cross the line.

I’m not saying I agree with this line of reasoning, but the clear idea is that Iran doesn’t currently have nuclear weapons.

The guns exist out there and the protesters exist out there. You’d just need some mobilizing incident to spark them not to leave the guns they already own at home next time.

It seems an easier solved problem than you let on.

If you’re talking OpenEvolve you have to specific put in the tests and expected values for each function for this approach to work.

That is outrageous! It’s unfair!

But hey, who would have figured that Trump wasn’t quite the stable genius successful businessman who wrote The Art of the Deal that he said he was?

To be fair to Trump, if he used a “ghost president” the same way he used a ghost writer he’d likely be a lot more successful.

Lmao, k

Software As A Surprise

If the question is things “only” old people say, you have to exclude phrases old people say that were repopularized through media.

“Heavy” (meaning important, grave)

For example this is a really quotable line from Back to the Future, so kids would pick it up.

I’m literally confused as fuck right now. Help explain this in a different way.

I provided evidence for a thing I believe in. You’re accusing me of refusing to believe the thing I showed evidence for?

Then why did you claim I can’t see it?

I refuse to believe that which I’ve seen no evidence for.

So long as it is more convenient to sarcastically quip about how you’re right instead of explaining it, I will struggle to be convinced by your words.

Sorry, but you are suggesting that the best strategy possible to stop the genocide is to be nice to the person committing the genocide

No, I suggested we adopt the best strategy regardless of what it is.

You said that even if the best strategy possible is to be nice, you wouldn’t consider doing do.

Great, I’ll make sure to report you to the mods if your openly admitting to acting in bad faith.

Feel free to do that, if I’ve broken the rules they should remove my comment. I didnt realize this was getting so personal so I will take this as the end of the convo, even across the other threads, just letting you know so you don’t waste time replying to those.

It would only be a compliment if you were trying to capture the flaw in liberalism.

I was.

Again, I appreciate the compliment. Take care.

When my goal is to describe the flaws of liberalism succinctly and you say “You’ve captured the flaw in liberalism extremely succinctly.” I have a hard time taking that as an insult, ngl.

Yes, I’m glad you understand how a discussion works. Presumably you then don’t want people to believe what you say?

Is this how you want the conversation to go? Are we gonna both just play dumb and ask loaded questions back and forth?

Is it?

Yeah? (You called me a Socialist earlier)

Because capitalism has rolled over the top of you none the less.

How exactly did you expect me to have predefeated the system I was born into?

That’s why, even though ‘your guard is up’, you can’t do anything about it; because you’re just a random person with no power

You’re not pointing out anything new to me.

That’s because we communicate using words, we can’t just directly transmit pure concepts to each other. If people can’t understand your labels they can’t understand you concepts.

EXACTLY!!! Yes! Love this.

So not as socialism.

No, as primitive Libertarianism. It’s right there.

I’m sure hoping you don’t think mob rule by bands of genocidal settler colonists is socialism?

You told me my definition of liberalism implies the US wasn’t liberal.

I agreed and quoted a marxist who described the US as primitive Libertarianism.

Now you think I’m saying the US has secretly been socialist this whole time?

Then my comment argues you shouldn’t.

Hey I’m sorry. I just gave your comment an actual read and only the first paragraph I initially read was bad faith patronizing.

In the rest you did bring up points worth responding to so I apologize and I will do that in a bit.

Just keep in mind I may actually have some knowledge in history and just might be able to back up claims I make.

Exactly, thank you great point. Are you starting to agree these aren’t very “liberal” actions so maybe the Republicans and Democrats aren’t so liberal after all?

if you’re just gonna continue to be this childish, then I have nothing else to talk about.

Respectfully, that’s where I tried to leave it 2 comments ago

And since you’re gonna read this, like it or not, your definition of being a liberal has no basis in reality

It’s not about liking or not liking it.

If you’re in a different reality than me, there’s not much we’re going to be able to say. I’d rather spend my energy on people in the same reality

You can cry all you want about how capitalism and liberalism as somehow separate, it won’t change reality.

:'(

Most Republicans also believe in those things

The Republicans are abducting citizens to El Salvadorian death camps…