this has nothing to do with the topic. this is indicative of an inability of unwillingness to engage in good faith
this has nothing to do with the topic. this is indicative of an inability of unwillingness to engage in good faith
whatever that means. if they used two separate accounts you wouldn’t even know. how about you just address or ignore each comment in it’s merits, and stop trying to control other people.
can you try to only reply to a comment once?
if they have two distinct responses, why shouldn’t they leave two distinct comments?
All she can do is pull votes from Democrats handing the election to Trump.
the ambiguity of this syntax is fun! the democrats are handing the election to trump, and jill stein is trying to pull votes from them!
Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system
viability is a myth invented by the media. hilary was viable. john kerry.
no, she’s going to be on the ballot whether we have ranked choice or no.
The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone
obama thanks you for not remembering that time he assassinated a 16 year old american citizen.
copying isn’t stealing
that’s not funding.
I seem to recall that the anonymity of car is based on obscuring transactions through bundling, but that method was deanonymized by poisoning wallrts somehow. this was like 10 years ago so my memory is fuzzy.
i thought monero’s mixer was show to be susceptible to poisoning.
strategic voting consolidates parties. values voting is the only way to elect someone with your own values.
I’m not sure you want to rely on Patreon in any case, since it also relies on the retention of rights for profit. In your scenario, when they upload to Patreon, anyone involved could tell them to get fucked and pay the author nothing.
anyone could do that now. people still get paid.
Exactly, and since it certainly follows a long tail distribution, the rest of the 250,000 creators on patreon make a tiny fraction of that. For the vast majority of people, it doesn’t provide a primary income.
this is true for the vast majority of storytellers and artists and musicians through all of history.
any time it has worked proves you are wrong. the top 50 patreons clear over $100k a year
only one person would need to be able to live on either model to disprove your claim. since that has definitely happened, you’re definitely lying.
you claim they are not feasible, but we know people do get paid through them, so you’re just lying.
you recognize two well known cases where copyright is not necessary to get paid. I don’t think there is even an argument at this point. have a nice day.
I didn’t say that. you’re making a leap of logic
it’s heuristic, so it doesn’t matter what layout you use.