Open source does not mean open license.
Open source does not mean open license.
It is 5 minutes of work to use your source control tool, and have a read only view for other people.
Being open source doesn’t mean you have to accept PRs or pay for audits. It just means your source is… Open…
There’s nothing disingenuous about that? Did we read the same things?
Being closed source doesn’t fix any of the issues they noted.
I’d rather they just say “I’m ashamed of my code”.
I just commented this elsewhere, but I personally feel that their reasons for being closed source are worse than actually just being closed source.
If you don’t want abusers to have rights, then just make it a felony.
It’s really that easy.
Mother Jones: these ads are killing people
Also Mother Jones: please disable your adblocker
Oh boy, what can’t we put ads in?
Can we get MtDew Green Lights with Coca-Cola Red lights?
The spacebar on laptops is free game, just asking for it.
It really is a shame that I can still buy bedsheets that aren’t branded with a corporate advertising campaign.