Interesting! Didn’t know Nikki Haley herself could pledge her loyalty to the loofah-faced shit-gibbon, but her PAC could decide to do a hard pivot. Can they rename the PAC?
If she had held strong against Trump, would have been interesting to imagine a Harris-Haley ticket. Probably a million wrong things about it, don’t get me wrong - but in terms of a unifying ticket… Lol
No need to tell me how stupid this is, i know!!
By the supreme absolute and totally incorruptible court of Trumpistan?
Well, it’s not like he’s already done trainwrecks that tarnished the reputation of multiple companies, so I’m sure we’re safe 😏
This thread is focusing on whether he’s right, even while being a shithead. The problem IMO is not whether he’s right or not, it’s what his ‘plans’ are if the world moves in the direction he starts nudging. Guy’s a psycho edgelord pro-fascist with Bond villain tendencies, but he’s surfed on trends to carve monopolies before… Idk
The real question then is whether the dems are willing to run someone solid and progressive against him, and whether that person would have a shot…
That fuckin sockets
I know it’s been said a bunch of times now, but I’ve never been so convinced of anything in my life as much as I’m convinced this means Trump shat in the Oval.
Why not choose a picture of her shaking Joe Biden’s hand then?
Idk, I feel like Republican attack ads on Bernie would have done what Democratic attack ads on Trump did: electrify his base. “HE WANTS EVERYONE TO HAVE EDUCATION FOR FREE!!!” damn, well, sign me up!
I know there would have been calls of “communist” ad nauseam, but idk that it has the horrible effect it once had - if anything it might have energized youth vote…
Idk
I wonder…
By his own legal admission, he’s not a journalist but an entertainer.
Thus what he’s doing with Putin is entertainment.
So he’s dealing with Russia (literally) and Russian companies to produce a profit making entertainment content.
Russia is under sanctions.
Isn’t he breaking the law?
Removes credibility from something that smells funny in the first place… I’d love to have a thoroughly researched vetting/peer reviewing of this
Hmm it’s an interesting philosophical debate - does that not qualify as “forever”?
So, folks, who can take over as CEO?
Well theres… (Looks at list of top people who immediately quit after the announcement) … Aah shit.
It was Clarke - Azimov had other highly relevant quotes though, particularly the one on anti-intellectualism…
Except it’s disproportionately killing those producing the least amount of global warming - I’ve yet to hear of a billionaire killed by global warming.