RT*** isn’t pointing at RT*, he’s pointing at the TV showing RT**. The fact you think otherwise is what makes the image unclear. I’m not sure why you insist on them being wrong.

I think int*** is meant to be pointing at int**, but the image is just unclear about where everything is in perspective.

Something tells me attempting to sue Nintendo because you didn’t get the job should count as a pretty major blemish.

I did see a German video where they sang “Springtime for Trump”, but it looks like it got taken down.

And because they’re so angry all the time, nobody wants to fuck them.

LLMs are random. Its weighted randomness that frequently values racist outputs like whitewashing a crowd or calling black people monkies (to name two recent examples), but it is still random. That’s why you can ask it the same question twice and get two different answers.

Ever notice how AI defenders try to pretend the technology is better than it is, and brush past the countless failings and ethical failures inherent to the technology by condemning humanity? A bad toolsmith blames the worker, I guess. At a certain point, if the technology is only doing bad things, or doing things badly, it might just be bad technology.

It makes mistakes with an alarming frequency, all with the same confident tone of writing as when it says anything else. It’s wrong so often that you’d need to use another source of information just to confirm it, which defeats the point in using AI in the first place!

It’s not smarter than the smartest humans, or even AS smart as them, or even as smart as REGULAR humans. It’s not even smart. It’s a magic eight ball that sometimes has the correct answer by pure chance. No intellect. No reasoning. Just probability.

Also: It steals from just about everyone; it encourages suicides and mass shootings; it’s frequently racist in its outputs; it’s burning, boiling and polluting the planet; it’s being forced on people who don’t want it; and billionares are using it to manipulate people. Probably some other stuff I forgot to mention.

Just in case you weren’t sure why AI is bad.

Imagine if I offered Dua Lipa 500 quid to have sex. She doesn’t need the money, she’s doing fine in the bedroom, and I don’t have that much money to spend. We can’t try to sweeten the deal by saying I’m a good lay. Even if we’re not being self-deprecating, we both know I’d be getting the better end of the deal here. She would be insulted I even asked.

That’s what’s going on. eBay is doing perfectly fine without a physical storefront, and GameStop isn’t a catch. GameStop made an unsolicited offer, and doesn’t have enough to actually pay it. This is an insult of an offer.

I love how this probably isn’t illegal, but people are checking for a law he might have broken because they really want it to be.

Eh, Putin’s in charge of both anyway, so there’s not much difference.

There is one way that “one man and one woman” wouldn’t be true, and that’s the trans community. Then again, I’m pretty sure the article isn’t thinking about that.

I just saw three comments in a row trying to correct each other while saying the same thing in different words.

…think to yourself “Is this something that insert racist/bigot who is incompetent would do?” If it is a yes, don’t post it.

I mean, they obviously would do it, or the headline is wrong. If they wouldn’t have done it, they wouldn’t have done it, but they apparently did.

But that’s just me being pedantic. I do agree with you that a lot of posts are just trying to dunk on Trump and his group chat for being stupid. Being stupid is not enough to be funny, and the headlines here should be comedic in some way.

You think these fuckers are giving us cake?

Oi! I’m a lazy programmer with no friends, and I will not take this slander!

Actually, if the onion ran info wars, it would tell people the site is satire. Which would be the first piece of correct information on the platform.

We don’t have a community called “quantum superposition of onion”, so this will have to do

I decided to look it up, just to be sure. Specifics vary based on where you are, but depicting anything too extreme is generally gonna be illegal. Even if it’s legal in the bedroom, it’s not necessarily legal in porn.

Heck, I’m British, and the age of consent is 16. It’s 18 in porn, though.

It’s also really efficient, setting up the entire relationship with just the word “step-bro”. Plus, it’s taboo enough for the characters to say “we shouldn’t”, but not SO taboo that the viewer thinks they actually shouldn’t.

I remember reading a while ago that, because you can’t have full incest in porn, the Game of Thrones porn parody (or, at least, one of them) was LESS explicit than the show.

And no. No we’re not. I doubt many places are.