nononono

He’s really good at writing words about his on-stolen-content-based generated image, you got to give him that.

But no, fuck copyrighting AI content, that’s a dead channel from a copyright perspective.

host it on my website

That’s distributing and barred under the other license item. Sorry to burst your bubble.

GitHub has a “clone” button, if you click on that you can get git links to download the code. The http-URL doesn’t require authentication.

Edit: I misread the comment that it’s about a different app.

Imagine being an author whose sole income is writing books.

Here comes an AI that stole indexed your work and is asked by a customer of OpenAI to summarise your books. It does so perfectly and the issuer is able to use your results freely, since they think it’s AI generated and doesn’t require attribution.

You receive nothing in return.

Good luck making a living.

Edit: stole to indexed, added edit note

How dare you speak for other nations like that.
Sounds like they’re lacking some essential American Freedom™!
Come to think of it, sounds like you’re acting very Red™ yourself.

(/s, if you missed it)

It’s gross, not net. The net amount is like 3200.

I work in the Dutch public sector in IT, but with a few years of experience, I’m already beyond 4k/mo.

Sounds like the union isn’t pulling it’s weight…

Hey, they gave some people an Uber Eats coupon

You’ve never used HDMI?

There’s half a dozens of us!

They might be printed on there, but as long as it looks like it has wifi (pointy units or the wifi symbol on your phone), people will buy it.

802.11 isn’t anywhere near common knowledge. That’s why it was named WiFi and trademarked to begin with.

The former, unfortunately.

For DNS and DDoS protection that wouldn’t directly be an issue.

For caching it would be breaking. You cannot cache what you cannot read (encrypted traffic can only be cached by the decrypting party).

The posts aren’t constraining the information though. They’re effectively advertisements linking to the information (advertising they have info for you to read).

The information itself is public and freely accessible.

You don’t. They’re usually posting awareness campaigns that link to government sites.

I’ve opted the example to elsewhere, but they’d be like “bought a house? Find out how the taxes work on (link)”

Nah, more like deleting explorer.exe.

There’s isn’t really a Windows equivalent for this, as Windows doesn’t give you control on this level.

It’d be as if you could delete services.msc but also the runner behind it.

The Dutch news agency NOS published it something to the likes of “Putin wins ‘election’”. Not sensationalised and not “follow for more” stuff, and a shitton of factual criticism.

Pretty good reporting, given that they’ll still somewhat lean in to the charade just as they’re calling Putin a president, whilst he’s a dictator.

If it were chmod 1777 it would be your mom after everyone had had their fun.

tar -extract -any -file is easier, auto detect the compression based on filename.