Neural networks have been phenomenal in the results they have achieved, out doing support vector machines, random trees, Markov models etc… But I do wonder if there is a bias towards it being able to mimick what the brain does like the other post said, and where are the limits.
For example in medicine, we want to spot unknown correlations to improve things like drug discovery, stratified medince, strange patterns in disease within a population that suggests unknown factors at play… There might be a mathematical model better that convolutional neural networks that doesn’t mimick the brain, but we maybe need an ai to develop that, maybe like deep thought in hgttg!
AI has been, is and will be very useful, but it’s in an over hype phase poised for a drop. I don’t think you understood what I was saying
I think you’ve spotted the grift here. AI investment has faltered quickly, so a final pump before the dump. Get the suckers thinking it’s a no-brainer and dump the shitty stock. Business insider caring for humanity lol
Well said, generational division is pure divide and conquer. Fortune.com isn’t in the business of agitating for class consciousness.
AIBot123 will make Meatbag456 much more productive at working the pointless bullshit crank.