Hey I wanna try what the bot usually does.

German chancellor a wasted opportunity.

I saved you several words, most of those redundant.

♥! :)

I have to make this nitpick:

“you” are the one keeping you on windows. You decide that those features are more important than any disadvantages.

Which I think is absolutely OK - that’s your choice. Many many people took this choice for a myriad of reasons and are the sum of “windows majority” - and no “I would change if” will perpetuate either feature development on Linux programs nor pressure on Microsoft.

OK now I have to escape to really smart assery and assume that’s what I meant the whole time ;)

Edit code 2 describes something that went wrong - but that something telling you that it went wrong was the tar binary which therefor most have been valid to evaluate that!

Under no circumstances did I assume that the hint towards help itself would’ve been an exit code 0, no sir!

To be honest: if I’d designed that bomb it would’ve exploded in my face for trying to be too clever.

tar

Done. That’s a valid command, no error code, nothing. KISS!

I will borrow The fisher-Price phrasing, thank you for that! Fully agree on the cura part.

I can’t answer that and it’s a valid question in my opinion. If I had to guess I’d speculate about disagreements in code style, build pipeline or similar.

Although I’d love to agree superslicer has sadly nowhere near the development power of prusa behind them - and feature parity is rarely given, basically any release of the two has “oh I want both of those!” (don’t know if it’s spelled correctly but arachnid mode for example was hyped to a point I checked back with prusa after a few months).

I just want to point it out in case people expect a “prusaslicer” but better in every regard :)

I’m just saying that I see that those two statements can exists at the same time without a huge mental leap - not that I agree with it - I apologize if I didn’t make that clear enough in the first post!

I read it like:

Mimic, pace of tone and body language are parts of the work.

That they don’t hit the main part (I.e the humor) is just the icing.

Perhaps I’m top lenient though.

That’s a huge today-I-learned for me, thank you! I took ill throw xeyes on it just to use ssh - C for the first time in my life. I actually assumed wrong.

I’ll edit my post accordingly!

(edit: here was wrong information - I apologize to the OP!)

Plus a GUI install is not exactly the best for reproducability which at least I aim for with my server infrastructure.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_damages

The New York Times archives are massive, even with the minimum described for statutory damage it’s not unreasonable.

Add to that a mechanic where you’re basing damage on generated revenue - as they do - and you have at least a legal argument.

I get what you’re saying - from the article and your comment I couldn’t name the group of people that it discrimates against though.

Perhaps that’s a different legal blah blah but where I’m from you can only discrimate against a protected group of people (race, religion, disability, gender are the ones I am aware of).

Discrimination would be a tough sell - and a “you’re creating a divide” would likely be met with a “well discuss that with your supervisor, this is a decision based on individual and team circumstances” - which leads then to the issues described in the OP.

I would be delighted if someone could bring more efficient HR confronting arguments!