Not strictly true. Firefox gets inferior support from cloud services, like Microsoft. Newer versions of their Web apps are not available on Firefox.

But there should be no downside. It’s all artificial.

Pretty soon Trump would have had more lawyers than he has voters.

Corporates keep doing these studies expecting different results.

Not to mention that he changed economic policy to ensure the boomer generation will dominate all following generations.

I mean, in South Africa we have a famously corrupt and incompetent government. And even we significantly outperformed the US in deaths per 100k people.

It does help to have publicly funded healthcare.

There is sure to be some of that, but they will at least get the blame for when it goes poorly.

They are obligated by many of their corporate and government clients to patch any security flaws and fix bugs.

I would prefer that they don’t touch what is working and just focus on fixing bugs and security issues.

This moving feature set and release of half finished software approach is why people have hated windows so much since the windows 8 days.

You got to say he was a master bullshitter, but he had some miracle workers engineers that made it happen.

Mint is a really good distro for people coming from windows 7 UI wise.

They also ripped out Snaps, which is half the performance problems with Ubuntu

I would support a law that requires software companies to open source software that they discontinue support on.

That way, companies that disappear don’t have their customers at risk.

And software companies will support software for longer.

Year of the Steamdeck. Praise Gaben!

I suggest you “treat” a random 10% of them each year. Should prune the crop to a manageable level.

It’s called rampant narcissism. Unfortunately it is a brain defect with no treatment except for public humiliation.

I like it, much more practical.

That is why I am in favour of the financial death penalty. Fines should be 10x the damage done. If a company cannot pay it, they are required to become a non profit.

Did not notice it today, but I am running ublock origin and they got my back.

Douchecanoodle

These things go in cycles. But I think the writing is on the wall. Google will never make the investment to unbloat Chrome.

I would say it’s good, but could be great with small adjustments in the way it is packaged.

I was mainly referring to how sluggish it was. For my web apps, it was always slower and the UI would bog down. Maybe not the correct definition of you refer to unnecessary features.

I am more referring to how lean or streamline the software is. Both in front end design and backend.

A lot of browser performance has to do with how you use it, so my experience is not universal.

Still, even full fat Firefox is skinny compared to the morbidly obese Chrome and edge browsers.

I made the switch to waterfox (Firefox fork) that strips out much of the problematic mozilla stuff.

I started to switch because of the tab containers, as I work across a dozen or so accounts in our MSP business.

Now I realised how good Firefox can be if you get rid of the bloat.