Full stack developer and privacy advocate. I like to keep the mentality, if you can program one language well, then you can program in any language!

  • 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldwayland was a mistake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    Wayland might be the future,
    but today we’re still living in the present…

    I was a fan, and tried Wayland,
    but it took less then 24hrs before I switched back to X.

    Just too many random bugs remain in Wayland rn…

    E.g:

    • Grayed out screen under HDR
    • LookingGlass unable to boot in fullscreen
    • Some program icons replaced with Wayland icon when running



  • For me the experience has been:

    • Stable
    • Easy to use
    • Enjoyed all the Arch niceness in the meantime.

    Which imo makes it a good distro,
    idiots would not make a good distro…

    Sure the people behind it made some doubtful decisions in the past, but that doesn’t change the fact that using it has been a bliss.

    Additionally, it’s all open source,
    so if they would ever turn anti-consumer,
    it can be forked into another distro.

    As I mentioned earlier, stop the distro hate.
    I’m not throwing acquisitions against other distros, instead I let people enjoy whatever flavor of Linux they desire…

    By now I helped a fair amount of Arch and other distro users through Lemmy / AUR / Issues, and I also learned a fair amount of Arch / Manjaro and other distro users.

    Linux is not the enemy here,
    not a single flavor…








  • If working with the AUR,
    you can alter the PKGBUILD and other build files on your own behalf.

    To either fix what’s wrong,
    or to roll back to a previous version of the package.

    I’ve did both a few times already,
    however I’m on Manjaro.
    Pamac, their graphical installer,
    prompts me if I’d like to edit the build files before starting the build/install process, unsure how to do it in Arch, but the ArchWiki should be able to tell you.

    Also, if you’d fix what’s wrong,
    please post your diff on the AUR package thread, that can save the maintainer some work / help with rolling an updated package out to the other users faster.


  • It automatically happened,
    I believe with every install of an updated Flatpak, which is rather often.

    Been a while though, since lately I’ve been happily using AMD for quite some time.

    But I do recall Nvidia driver updates slowing down my update process by a lot,
    while I have none of that with AMD.


  • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI can't use AMD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Even not the “issue” that basically every time you update something, you have to wait a long time to download proprietary nvidia drivers?

    That’s what annoyed me the most back in the day with the Nvidia drivers,
    so many hours wasted on updating the drivers.

    With AMD, this is not the case.

    And haven’t even talked about my issues with Optimus (Intel on-board graphics + Nvidia GPU) yet, which was a true nightmare, took me weeks of research to finally make it work correctly.







  • Lol, I’m done discussing with you fruity.

    You’re blatantly ignoring / laughing away evidence to protect the image of a bad, but for some reason, you’re favorite spyware slinging company.

    And on top of it,
    now also bashing the privacy and linux communities since you can’t make valid debunkments :P

    Instead of bashing,
    to suck up to that spying company,
    perhaps you should try defending your rights to privacy for a change.

    You may rant in the void now,
    I won’t waste time on your fanboy nonsense anymore.