That would still only be a part of his problem though. His trouble was also that the information he put down were factually inaccurate, and he used different valuations for his tax forms.
That would still only be a part of his problem though. His trouble was also that the information he put down were factually inaccurate, and he used different valuations for his tax forms.
I wonder if he said the bit where he suggested that Democrats may not have more seats because of campaign or strategy with a straight face?
Maybe he’s saying that the democratic need to get better at unrigging the maps? Meanwhile he has blocked effectively, so that’s good strategy?
What if Trump wins and run for a third term? If the constitution isn’t enforced anyway, why would the 2 term limit matter?
Brave man. Can’t even begin to imagine what he must’ve gone through.
Clever jibe. Consider me tickled.
The whole article is quite a dystopian read. Paxton’s intervention into medical decisions is self-righteous, and a statement from an anti-abortion group that was so cruel I felt a little sick.
The article also points out that the eighth circuit has already ruled on a case challenging a similar law, that the law is constitutional.
How’s disposable income calculated? Also, once you have your raise, I assume that while you payment might be at a similar level, your take home would still have increased?