Have you checked if there is any record of your Bluetooth card on the Linux hardware database?
That might give you an indication of how well it’s supported

cat propaganda

Knew someone would say that, lol, gold project, sad that it’s gone unmaintained and my man started working on home-manager at home
…wait

Yew* Rust

FTFY

Let the Zucc feel the heat

Oh that’s fair, never would have guessed myself

That’s exactly what a Stockholm syndrome victim would say!

Where programming?

C supremacy

LGTM+

I’m guessing you’re currently on Windows, right? If so, Virtualbox is perfectly fine, otherwise, if you’re on Linux already, you could use Boxes or Virt manager that are more performant, but don’t stress yourself if you just wanna play around Virtualbox will always be more than sufficient.
As for the ISOs you can just get them directly from the distro websites or, if using Boxes, you can choose one at VM creation and it’ll download it for you

Damn these programmers horny af

I see, I think it’s clear enough now. Never noticed if that happened to me too, but yes, since you got that consistently, it definitely deserves to be discussed

When I install anything through wine/proton, the apps on the screen lose their focus

With “the apps” here you mean the Linux apps, right?

When I bring up an app into focus from the panel, it shows behind whatever app that is already on the screen.

Also here I’m confused if you’re referring to Linux or Windows apps.

Beside that, for potential bug reports like this, I think you’ll get more/better responses over at the KDE forum as stated in the page about bug reporting https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting

DisplayPort connector stuck in socket I think

I see.

tor has geo location issues.

Could you explain what you mean with this? I’m not sure I understand

mullvad for looking shit up on ecommerce sites with new ID each time

Is it sufficient? I’d always assumed it was easily targetable with the IP so I started using TOR for that purpose

The tool presents a significant privacy risk, and shows that people may not be as anonymous in the YouTube comments sections as they may think.

I don’t understand how this makes the privacy on YouTube any worse when all the information it sources from is already public, this is just automated doxxing, which, while we’ll agree to be unethical, was never a privacy violation, it is just the consequence of the actions of who posted the information to begin with.
Also does it really violate YouTube’s privacy policy? It’s new to me that service consumers can be subject to the policy when it’s not the third parties that YouTube actively sends the information to, that sounds more to me like Terms of service, which are hardly enforceable fully (thank goodness, so we can have our yt-dlp and PipePipe)

The duality binary of man

There is Interstellar!