A better timeline?
Windows UI design peaked with Windows 98 and Unix UI design peaked with IRIX imo
Very tired nerd who doesn’t know how to speak correctly
Ask me about floppa, Plan 9, or computer architecture or anything computers really (if you want)
:cat-vibing:
If I don’t reply to you it’s probably cuz I’m too tired, sorry :(
A better timeline?
Windows UI design peaked with Windows 98 and Unix UI design peaked with IRIX imo
I am so tired haha
Okay but it was less , relatively to now
Ohh, I know, I was just making a joke cuz ed will print ?
when it doesn’t recognize a command and many people will see that over and over if they can’t figure out how to exit lol
I also got lost in vi and ed when I first used them lol
Tbh if I’m just making quick edits to config files or whatever I use nano lmao
?
If you like Unixy editors, highly recommend also looking into acme
Russ Cox describes it in this video as more like an “integrating development environment” as in it works with your surrounding operating system rather than an “integrated development environment”
Doesn’t shine as much on Unix as in Plan 9 though. Also no linter or formatter built into or distributed with acme but you probably could get your language’s usual tools to work pretty well with it
Ed is the standard text editor.
Linux is based? Pls don’t talk to me or my wife’s IRC server ever again.
Don’t go to harmful.cat-v.org and look at their political sections, worst mistake of my life
Plan 9 posting
Better to be deadresting than undead like Unix
Plan 9 isn’t dead
It’s just resting
Programmers can trust language security features too much…
Of course, they’re nice to have and really can make things easier to implement securely but it’s still very easy to introduce security problems or bugs into any code. This is just an unsolvable problem of writing imperative code. All imperative code will reliably have memory leaks (even in Java!) and security holes because no compiler can check to see if you thought of everything.
And large and complex compilers/interpreters with these security features can end up introducing their own security problems or bugs in the process of implementing them.
I’m just tired of people entirely dismissing languages like C because they don’t have these features. Especially when the operating systems their code runs on and their languages may even be implemented in C!
C is very reliable. It works almost everywhere with very little resources or overhead and many of the most fundamental parts of our systems (that have to work reliably) are written in C. Many of the languages in that image are even implemented in C.
If you want to write portable, fast, and simple code C can help you with that if you use it in the right way.
Save me Victor Glushkov, save me, save me Glushkov